New Skyrim dlc

I think the better question is why did OP put his name in the title? This isn't Art and Digital Graphics.

So you don't actually want discussion. You'd rather just roll around in your own pseudo-intellectual trap?

This is probably the worst way to start a thread. You undermine any possibility for real discussion by opening smarmy about something that, frankly, no socially adjusted person would be smarmy about.

It's an expansion for TESV. It's not like you found the next Minecraft in alpha here. Cut back on the asshollery and you might find people will actually be thankful for your diligence.

Discussion started.

I'm curious how you classify being antagonistic as "diverse", much less define it as a positive for this particular forum. I think the burden of a reasonable explanation falls upon you more than it does me.

In all fairness, any post that starts with your name in the title then proceeds to imply that we're going to be 'butthurt' right out of the get-go seems like a perfectly good place to talk about you. This might not be IB, but you've posted an IB-quality invitation. I doubt you're surprised and you're hoping that the rules be ever in your favor, but this defense you're hoping for isn't as strong as you think.

You're implying that wanting an argument is a bad thing, which goes against your definition of diversity. I'm expressing myself in a way that makes you uncomfortable, but since it's different, then it's okay because it's part of the gamut that makes the internet. However, that conclusion is absurd and as a result, your conceptualization of diversity doesn't work both ways like a good idea should.

This further deconstructs your ideas about positive contributions to the site. I never said that behaviors need to be literally positive, but positive for the site as a whole. Starting threads about games with your name in it and insults to follow is a bad idea, whereas discussion, even if it is heated, isn't necessarily bad. You knew beforehand that it would likely bug people. Instead of omitting the aspects that you understood to be inflammatory, you went along and posted them. The fact that you expected it actually makes it worse, not better, because you are the author of the post.

As for the issues with conformity, people do suggest other people to change their behavior, even on friendly terms and casual circumstances, so your analogy doesn't actually work. I'm not attacking you, but I do attack the efficacy of your logic and your tone because you can change those without any damage to your personality whatsoever.

As for my purpose, it isn't just you, truly. I've seen this kind of thread-baiting before because I used to do it elsewhere. I want everyone else to know that it is perfectly okay to call someone on their attempts at making a flame-threads and that the side of reason is on their side, even if the rules appear to punish those who react reasonably.