Darkhilt wrote...
I'm guessing your NOT considering tabletop as an "actual game"?
Why would i be comparing a pc game to a tabletop game? I was obviously talking about the pc games. You do know which section we're in right?
Darkhilt wrote...
Just because a game is more popular and is so simplistic that even a child can pick it up doesn't mean it's better.
The same goes for the opposite.
And
"so simplistic that even a child can pick it up"? Why would that even be a bad thing?
Does it make you feel smarter when you try to degrade the RTS genre in general? What was even the point of that statement? Some random pointless bashing?
Further more, it's pretty amusing to see how completely oblivious you are about the things you talk about when you try to talk shit about the mechanics of a game that's widely considered the hardest E-sport game around, just behind Brood War that is, but that's aside the point.
Everyone can play but few master it. Does it ring a bell?
Darkhilt wrote...
If you consider the canon and storyline for both, warhammer is infinitely better.Warhammer allows for countless stories and foundations to come into play.
Why the fuck would i compare the storylines between something that has been out for like 25 years and spends way more time and efforts into fleshing out it's lore to pc games which main focus is perfect gameplay and balance between it's races??
Way to miss the point.
Darkhilt wrote...
Perhaps I'm not seeing it in the right light, but a bunch of mercenaries and a decrepit government of mankind is fighting Zerg that don't really have a purpose but to kill whatever they are near and are controlled by men and women without purpose for commanding them to do so and as a third party there are Protoss who don't exactly have a stand in this but can't fight the Zerg even though they've survived this long?
I have no idea what the hell you're blabbering about here. The Zerg don't have a purpose but is controlled by men and women? Who? What? The Protoss can't fight the zerg? huh?
Do you actually know what you're talking about or are you just totally awful at conveying what you're trying to say?
Darkhilt wrote...
If not for the ability to show that Starcraft is a recycled piece of trash that ruined this world as we know it
You really work hard to come off as an fanboy who's opinion might as well be worthless in this discussion due to way too much bias and ability to look at things with an open mind.
And since you've got such a big boner for "originality"
here you go
IvIajoi2n wrote...
Weren't both Starcraft and Warhammer based on the original Starship Soldier and the old Starship Trooper series to begin with. That probably drew inspiration from somewhere else as well. No one has had an original idea in ages, everything is based on something which has already occurred. There isn't anything wrong with that. some of the best Fantasy Novelists will openly admit to drawing tremendous amounts of inspiration from History.
Before the Zerg or the Tyranids, there was Alien. etc. you can compare the structure of the Space Marines to the Roman Legion, And so forth. The Warhammer Universe has always been more focused on plot, and political intrigue. In contrast the Starcraft Universe picks out specific characters, who move the plot. They're both valid writing styles.
People need to stop this originality game, because this is a business. You find who is doing shit right, you take it, you add and improve. This goes both ways, the games are evolving because they have competition. Warhammer 40k came first, That's just a fact. Starcraft took the idea, they added more to it. Warhammer has done the same. It's an ongoing battle that helps to improve both universes.
Can you imagine what kind of watered down shit we'd have to deal with if one of these companies stood at the top by themselves. In the universe of Sci Fi Fantasy games, who can compare to Warhammer OR Starcraft. They'd have no real damn competition.
Excellent post. +rep.