Xenon wrote...
Perhaps 7 years ago Wikipedia was more controversial, but today is a different day. It is so packed full of accurate information after achieving its reputation that it can be compared to Encyclopedia Britannica.
Maybe so, but I still-
You're right to be critical of the sources you come into contact with, but your only mistake is preferring the words of a random person on a porn forum over a communal encyclopedia site.
Well...
You've got a point, actaully. I guess it's back to another month of searching the web before I'm confident enough to continue with the story. Still disregarding that article on Ishan, though. No matter how much better Wiki is now, no one should take facts from an article that has no sources.
Thanks for explaining things and replying, Xenon. What you said is true (and so painfully obvious I kind of have a headache for not noticing it before). Compound the fact that ANYONE can say they are something without actually being said something, double that with the fact that they'd be talking through voiceless text over the net without any picture of themselves, and you've got even more of a reason not to ask randomly on
any site.