So the story involves a young girl/ woman who is shaped by a trauma. Her first formative sexual experience isn't consensual, is public and at the hands of a stranger. This framework is then allowed to be the excuse for the lurid sequences that make up the rest of the story without addressing the first encounter as rape or questioning the psychological and emotional impacts on the character. The criminal catalyst is instead portrayed as a validation for ongoing sexual behavior that rewards a male with no emotional investment in the female character. This artist has become a repeat offender on pushing the theme that women have no agency of their own and are only present to be used. Always about having choice overridden in favor of the male character that always "knows what she needs". In a word, this is WRONG.
Heavy emphasis on what some might refer to as the Madonna-Whore complex (pure on the outside, nasty on the inside). Plus FMC is portrayed as having little backbone (at least mentally), so she can be easily molded to accept the idea that, in the end, she's merely a walking breathing sex doll for Sensei's pleasure.
Last Modified Thu Jun 23, 2022, 11:16 pm