artcellrox wrote...
Uh, yes, Ms. Tegumi. Arthur C. Rox reporting from Basses-'R-Us Weekly. How long have you been secretly sonducting this study of the users of CTFG? Also, how much support would you need to continue this "series" of yours?
Study? Hardly. There were a number of complaints about users exhibiting behavior in paragraph(ii) of my post, which incited my curiosity.
We would need full support of the U.N. Security Council. Seriously though, maybe a number of posts exhibiting interest and some minor discussion. (I just perused through some of the CTFG threads and my mind was aboggle with the word "WHY", the kind of "WHY" in which you can clearly envision that the road to the explanation is the same as the one where you lose your faith in humanity.) I'm saying it's difficult.
Antw0n wrote...
artcellrox wrote...
Antw0n wrote...
Passive-aggressive posts are the most fun to read.
It's hella fun just browsing through that thread.
I agree with Antw0n regarding this. It is fun to browse through sometimes, when it doesn't make you paranoid.
It's like Passive-Aggressive Butthurt-Twitter for people who don't use Twitter.
So is it somehow amusing to read emo-cut-yourself posts for hours or even minutes on end?