brok3n butterfly wrote...
The market has changed since the 90's and early 2000's when it was in more mainstream TV. Actually the market is pretty much the same but I think American culture has done most of the changing since then.
What I mean by that is that anime's target audience is (for the most part) teens and people in their early 20's. Not saying there's anything wrong with being 25, 45, or 95 and anything in between and watching Madoka. We know it sells in Japan.
On the other hand, US teens and people in their early 20's watch reality TV and sitcoms and almost anything animated (Family Guy, South Park, etc excepted) is seen as unrealistic or kids stuff. This means that the anime that comes to the US ends up on Cartoon Network and so on which are targeted at kids around 8 or 9. I can't speak for every kid out there but when I was that age I loved Dragonball. (Thank you Toonami)
So why did One Piece, Naruto, etc disappear from after school TV? I think its because some parents saw their kids re-enacting it and flipped out. TV stations then moved the show to a block where 8 year olds are asleep (late night) but those of us that actually like the show are far too few in number to make it profitable for TV. And so its mostly DVD's. All of this is just my guess btw. I havent been watching anime for too long so someone could fill me in on 90's anime that aired in the US.
The companies that license and bring us English translations are completely aware we exist and will buy their products. They probably know its getting more popular too but it needs to become mainstream for them to put it on TV again. I never want to see it become popular because the price of merchandise will skyrocket.
Very eloquently spoken, sir or madam.
I wish to point out that America, which most of us live in, I am assuming, has many political problems of its own currently and congress is trying to pass some pretty ridiculous and harmful laws right now, which makes me lose even more faith that our government will improve, but will rather, continue rotting until it collapses from the bottom-up.
For example, the two laws abbreviated SOPA and PIPA, or the Stop Online Piracy Act and the Protect Internet Protocol (IP) Act, have the positive, and also the negative effect in the same sense, of allowing companies to shut sites down for infringement.
However, given the nature of corporate bodies in the United States today, I can only interpret the effects of either of these laws being passed as negative. While copyright infringement and piracy are indeed problems faced by the world, the US congress is attempting to pass a law that will allow them to instantly shut down any site which 'could possibly contain infringing material whether present in user accounts or the site itself', in order to control and dominate the market, and also the internet.
Say goodbye to online streaming sites, the pirate bay, and many other places that many of us visit every day, and say hello to corporate lawsuits on otherwise innocent and law-abiding individuals for multiple millions of dollars, whether it is in the US or internationally, they will enforce it via either one of these laws.
Also, the differences between the Stop Online Piracy Act and the Protect Internet Protocol Act may seem different if taken at face value, but they have very similar functions. However, the Protect Internet Protocol Act is even more dangerous than the stop online piracy act, and not just for common citizenry - for corporations such as banks and national vaults including the treasury.
The Protect Internet Protocol Act, if successfully passed, essentially protects the user of an IP address entering a site by law, and so if, for instance, an extremely skilled hacker compromised a bank's security systems at night and locked themself inside the bank vault, by law, the police would be forced to allow them to have their way with people's money without reprimand or punishment until they left the banking establishment. Also, unless they left with cash in hand, it would be nearly impossible to capture or track said hacker who completely compromised their security, and even if they could, the law would prevent said person from being a criminal.
Think about all your savings accounts, suddenly empty one morning and it's the law that you cannot do anything about it. Quite a nice situation, no?
Absolutely not.