wcsinn wrote...
ryuuhagoku wrote...
I hope you don't mind if I only respond to this paragraph.
I do actually, a little bit - I was quite looking forward to your answers on several other points :(
No problem, I just tend to babble longer than most would prefer. I'll give a fuller response.
wcsinn wrote...
I constantly hear dubs suck, this dub sucks - OK, why? Slightly underwhelming is pretty vague, and if that is the extent of it's short-comings is "the dub sucked - no surprise" either deserved or fair?
You'll notice that I did retract that opinion. In retrospect, I do agree that my statement was neither deserved nor fair.
wcsinn wrote...
ryuuhagoku wrote...
Notice that I didn't say the depiction was sexist, but it did hint at a clear master-servant relationship.
You did not, but you certainly hinted at it heavily. I'll give you the master-servant relationship, but don't you think you're over analyzing and reading more into the situation than is implied? The very nature of their being was to be involved in a master-servant relationship, is a genie-master relationship any different? Sometimes things are just what they are shown to be without some deep philosophical or meta-physical meaning - they're damn cartoons!
ryuuhagoku wrote...
This ties in to my criticism of the portrayal of loyalty- the show perpetuates, via an obvious metaphor, the belief that one cannot be happy and single. The sekirei who resisted emerging were shown as miserable in their restraint.
You have a vivid imagination and apparently a need to over-analysis (at least in my opinion), the un-emerged Sekirei did not ALL want or even look to find an Ashikabi, some resisted to the very end - others wanted to wait to find the right partner. Human nature is to want to find a partner - few folks want to grow old alone.
ryuuhagoku wrote...
In no way am I opposed to love and relationships; in fact, I'm rather hoping for some of both in my near future. However, while I may want it in my life, many people don't, and that's an entirely legitimate preference. One which was never shown in a truly positive manner in this show.
Once again - it's a damned cartoon! And even if it wasn't, why should the author feel obliged to show every possible lifestyle choice?
True, I did imply that sexism was involved, because honestly, I did sense a rather strong gust of gender roles from Sekirei. Of course, I feel the same way about most harems, so I'm really not singling out this one.
The author need not show
every possible lifestyle choice, but at least represent the highly relevant ones. In a show about bonds and pairs, the happily single one who feels no need to find a partner is a fundamentally important foil to the main protagonists imo.
Regardless of the author's intentions to depict society in a certain way, some depiction did happen. When those who were unimpressed with this depiction lay their complaints, is "too philosophical" really a meaningful charge to levy against them?
wcsinn wrote...
ryuuhagoku wrote...
Sure, I'm a pretty analytical person, and some (such as you) would say I take it too far at times. Still, that's what comes naturally to me, and there's nothing wrong with that. People have different ways of expressing themselves, and if others dislike it, they can choose not to engage the offender. Of course, people with differing opinions can also have enriching interactions, but this doesn't happen all that often.
I agree that being analytical isn't necessarily a bad thing, and that different folks are going to draw there enjoyment from a series in different ways. But I totally disagree on the thought that people who disagree should simply "choose not to engage the offender".
Forums by their very nature exist to promote interaction and people forget that - they make a post seeking confirmation of their opinion or stance, and if they don't receive it they get angry at the other posters (not talking about you btw). In your case you made several sweeping and extremely vague arguments condemning the series on a public forum, if I totally disagree (which I do) why would I not engage you? Frankly, some of your statements scream to be engaged and in several cases (at least so far) you've been unwilling or unable to defend your position.
I did state "people with differing opinions can also have enriching interactions, but this doesn't happen all that often." Call it pessimistic, but in my experience, people who disagree tend to fling shit at each other more often than shake hands. However, what we are doing is what I would describe as "shake hands", and I'm not detracting from the value of forums in making it possible. Just saying it could happen more.
wcsinn wrote...
ryuuhagoku wrote...
As for it being generational- I'm 21, how old are you?
62
BTW - I got two notifications but found only one reply - am I missing something?
Well there's something I don't see everyday. Although I'm sure you get that all the time in these parts. The multiple notifications were because it bugged out posting my reply, so I deleted it (several times) and posted the same one again.