SolidShark wrote...
Lab wrote...
SolidShark wrote...
Lab wrote...
SolidShark wrote...
Lab wrote...
November is better.
I hate it.
Did I ask you for your opinion?
Did you request to not say so?
Do you also interject and reply to the random statements of others as you walk down the street? Is your opinion so valuable that you feel the need to voice it wherever you go?
No, but I would be glad to be questioned to have a pleasant conversation, and perhaps learn something new. The value of an opinion is irrelevant if someone is not willing to listen or is incapable of understanding. Why are you, as said in a common phrase, "on the defensive"?
I'm sure you would be thrilled to engage in a conversation with someone of my intellectual capability, however; I do not share your sentiments. I don't think I would have anything to learn from someone who can't even tell the logical difference between offense and defense. You are clearly the one who feels the need to defend your action, it is exactly what you are doing right now is it not? You're trying to justify your response to my statement when I did not ask for anything of the kind.
I sincerely hope you are not someone who thinks that the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence; the absence of a structure granting reply permissions does not imply that one is accepting responses globally.
"November is better, what do you guys think of November?" Contains a structure that permits global responses as it is not directed at any specific entities or entity.
"November is better, what do you think of November SolidShark?" Contains a structure that permits a specific entity to respond.
"November is better." Contains no structure that permits any entity from responding, therefore it should be assumed that you are not to reply unless the context permits otherwise, for example the opening post of a thread.