KageNoKyo wrote...
Likhos01 wrote...
KageNoKyo wrote...
/a/ has always been autists.
But they're autists capable of action. They have done things inside and outside the internet and you'd be ignorant to laugh them off as a baseless threat.
While you guys pretend to have a "life", unmindful of your privileges; anons have been fighting against shills like Jewcob to make sure that those privileges are kept free and available.
Its indeed a selfish endeavor, but damn it, at least we're fighting for something important in our lives and all that emotion makes us feel alive. Even if that emotion happens to be hate, malice and rage.
PS: It also doesn't help Jacob that he piqued /pol/ and /b/'s attention. He's a walking caricature.
Get a girlfriend, your whining over the loss of your free porn is pitiful.
You have no argument that would give you reason, nor cause that's worth supporting.
The day porn is important in our life is the day I see a chicken getting high on meth.
Excellent rebuttal.
Why don't you go ahead and follow your idealistic, misguided sense of righteousness and pay $30 for every hentai title you have ever fapped to.
And why not pay crunchyroll for subtitled anime. No torrents.
Don't even bother reading or downloading manga online. Go to a bookstore and buy it.
Then you tell me what your subjective value of porn is compared to every other media you'd be forced to pay for without your privileges.
I'm gonna have to disagree there. I can't understand how you can call his sense of righteousness as misguided? I thought we live in a world where everyone are free to do whatever they want to do as long as it doesn't take the benefit of others?
Having Fakku as an official publisher means paying for the stuff you've been having for free. But that doesn't mean you can't have it for free. Crunchyroll did try that, and failed. Hence, torrents. I seriously can't see the fact that there will be no more hentai from wanimags not being able to be accessed for free just because Fakku has decided to publish it legally.
You have no rights to call someone's action as misguided because you have no evidence, mr defamation-with-no-evidence.