New Revised Buy a Fakku Member

How about when a buyer claims, he/she should post his/her current post count(real posts and total posts) and rep.
Like this...

I'm buying XXX.


RP 361
TP 15,783
Reputation 176

and that status is locked and stays like that for 24 hours
(after no one else has challenged him/her for an auction)?
And if challenged, he/she should post their stats as well.


In the list, it says:

User has bought: XXX, XXX, XXX
Status: RP 361, TP 15,783, Reputation 176
Zenny Used: RP -100, TP -1000, Rep -100


And more clearer rules.
You can only use your TP (total post) for ordinary purchase, you cannot use them for auctions.
If you ran out of TP, you can use your RP (real post) and Reputation to compensate for your TP.
RP and Reputation are used in auctions.
Auctions starts at 200 zenny.
Amount cap for TP is 10000
1 TP costs 1 zenny for normal purchase
1 RP costs 1 zenny for auctions and normal purchase
1 rep costs 10 zenny for auctions and normal purchase

TPs have a cap because it's easy to get them.
RPs have double use because of their... well... double use... it means you get two zennies per post outside of I.B.
Reps have higher amount because of their rarity.



Well hope at least one of them was useful... =-=

actually Giru said part of my Idea, me and rise were discussing it and as of now to let everyone know, RP and Rep will ONLY be used in auctions.

[font=verdana][color=green]That, genuinely speaking, was common practice anyway.

let me give you an example

Me: 100RP 5000TP 10Rep

I buy "person" for 2000 TP

Second person auctions me for them

I bid 1 RP
They Bid 2 RP
I bid 3 RP and win

in the end I pay 2000TP and 3RP

[font=verdana][color=green]Ah, I see. Thanks for clarifying it. But yes, that certainly seems a good new rule to implement.

so how much munnies do i has?

This also stop people from trying to auction to get people at a lower price, since you still have to pay the initial TP

Will... sir JACOB be on-sale?
Buying possibility, low? High?

Can we still buy multiple users at once?

[font=verdana][color=green]Mhmm, that is true. I thought that this rule was a good way to provide disincentive to rush to the auction. That rule, mixed with possible minimum increments to the RP in auctions, would be most adequate.

Three users, then you wait for 24 hours.

I don't know about adding a required minimum though, since you are already paying the initial fee, imposing an additional fee just because someone auctions you seems a bit much. I do however think that I should add a penalty for those who join an auction but have no intention of winning just to make someone waiste their zenny. For example

my above example BUT:

when person two lost, they have to pay half of the "TP" that the person cost. So since the person cost 2000 they still have to pay 1000TP but not any RP. The only difference is if you are DEFENDING a purchase. if you lose you do not lose any RP or TP.

I noticed in the last game some people would join an auction just to make someone use a lot of their money, then at the last minute back out. I mean, you wouldn't auction someone if you knew you were going to lose right? haha

Ah, like Yu-Gi-Oh! Nice! :D

[font=verdana][color=green]Well, it makes the auction get a move on quicker. I mean, when people exchange 1RP increases, it's just really boring to watch. I like to see the price escalate quicker, just so the auction is done and dusted quicker.

Ah, bugger you. You just destroyed my only means of fun there. But yeah, I think that that's a good rule as well, despite my form of fun being taken away from me.

How about rules to bring the maths to the users? It can't be down to accountants all the time.

Yeah, if people want the purchases I will make a requirement on what they post for it to be valid. part of which, is doing a little simple math, that "Oh my," I'm sure will be a lot of work for some users HAHAHA

[font=verdana][color=green]Haha, tell me about it. Are you going to implement the suggestion about having tri-monthly new TP, RP and Rep implementations? If it's done automatically, it will only cause confusion and such.

I would like to say there should be a reclaim round.

I'm for sale? Who's pimping me and not paying me anything!? I deserve a cut!

Hmm.

I need an assistant...

rise from the grave!