I was thinking. What is, the exact difference between "The Root" and "The Truth". What should we actually try to find out?
"The Root" would be, the source of everything, the origin of answers. While "The Truth" would just be the fact, the proof, the evidence to the questions we want answered.
"The Root" will always be the truth but "The Truth" will not always be "The Root". Within truth lies deep within it, lies. Even though not impossible, it's hard to strip it naked until you uncover "The Root" of the truth, and then again, you don't know if you'll actually get "The Truth" within the truth itself...
The other thing is, "The Root" is harder to find than "The Truth". It needs massive research and dedication. It also needs a strong will, since well, since it is the origins of our questions, it will reveal answers that will be hard for feeble minds to handle.
it's just a name. nothing to gasp out for is there.
@neo: there's no research in philosophy. how do you go about to prove things when it's all wordplays?
you can prove it logically starting with some axioms but are the axioms justified? how do you know that there will be no emergent complexity as the numbers go bigger?
example, tragedy of the commons. everyone acting on the simplest principle of profit, but it results in the greatest loss for the community as a whole.
if something as simple can give rise to complexity... how are we gonna talk about root or truth at all?