Waifu Game Changes

Better than Waar's game already.

We are talking about TMS, I doubt it.

From Skype:


But we'll see.

NTR rule.

If you have a higher Rep than them, you can NTR a waifu from them. A waifu can be stolen a maximum of twice.


It's perfect. The Rep system is currently broken, so you can't have friends help Rep boost you to target someone- and Rep instead of Posts so people can't just spam the shit out of the forums.

It's also a likelier to be a boon to older users. I'd like to think that there be some advantage to seniority.

For Neggers, it's a different ballpark- they can't steal from Positives, and Positives can't steal from Neggers. And it'll go the opposite way: a -83 can NTR a -5, for example.


EDIT: And no, I'm not suggesting this as a self-serving rule. Yes, I may have 246- but most of my girls are fairly popular, and the people most likely to troll me have higher Rep than I. Hurts me as much as anyone else- and I know that I'm not the only one who wants to see how NTR who work out.

Everyone will have to watch out for Shinji.

I don't like the guy, but I figured such a severely mentally challenged retarded asswipe could use a break from his undoubtedly miserable existence.

FUND IT.

I am faithful to no-one but myself.

Why? Because fuck you, that's why.

...in all seriousness though, I fail to see how limiting people's choices for playing longer is supposed to keep people interested. Unless there are other things that'll balance it out, in which case, I'm all ears.


Banning Saber is cool though. I honestly can't stand that pony-tail...bob...thing on her head.

Ouch.

Did he fuck the love of your life and make you watch or something?

Nah, I just find him stupid and unamusing.


I also woke up absurdly early for no reason- and I find it easier to be mean in the morning.

Define "older users". People who have participated in more games, or people who've been around longer on the site?

And wasn't the intent to lure more people to play? With that rule, it's pretty much doing the opposite..

Kinda both.

And as for attracting new users- people join in regardless. It could also be seen as incentive to be better and more active users on the site. I guess the only ones who really lose out are the hardcore lurkers (as in- been on here for years but have only posted about 12 times or so).

Not making it a permanent rule- I don't have that power anyway- but what's the harm in trying something new?

Right... Which is why Waar specifically considered attracting new players so important when choosing the new game master, of course.

We've had new people join in every game. Some leave, some stay. Just like anything else.

And what's to say that a little risk is an automatic deterrent? Some people enjoy a little spice.

Can't disagree with that. Didn't see any reason to change much myself, to be honest. Stability attracts both new and old players more than radical changes.

Guess it pretty much boils down to two dogmas- each with their own faults and merits; either-

-Don't fix what ain't broke,

and

-Nothing ventured, nothing gained.

ban cirno

Dat sudden plot twist...



[size=1]I like it...[/h]

Yeah I pretty much agree with luin here only minute changes needed to be made otherwise the system we had was a pretty solid and established system.

As to pumpjacks NTR idea......no.....just no.

and again I am against the banning of characters.

Chicken.