razama wrote...
People want to feel like their moment in history contains something of great significance, that a defining moment is going to happen during their time - and what more defining then the end of the world.
Of course part of it is just the natural fear of being afraid to die as well.
Ahhhhh, here's another fun aspect:
During the cold war, my grandma would actually
look forward to the Yankees and the Russkis sending glowing death hurtling through the stratosphere. And after Chornobyl she actually
hoped "the cloud" would just slowly march across the earth and indiscriminately kill everyone, painfully.
Her reasoning? She didn't want to be survived by anyone else. If she got to croak, she wanted to at least take everyone with her. Many other old people I've met since thought much along the same lines.
What troopers!
LD wrote...
Probably depends on how the world economy is at that point. When people are actually making money, they're too distracted to go for doomsday crap like that. But when they're out on their ass and hungry and miserable, they latch onto stuff like this very easily, especially when news organizations pump it up like crazy to make money.
Beg to disagree, to a point.
Y2K was fairly huge in the U.S., yet the U.S. economy was doing great at that point. It was the late nineties! Halcyon days of dotcom! The roaring nineties!
People will always latch onto irrational doomsaying.
The question is, when do things grow violent, and then I think it is no longer a matter of mere economy, but more generally existential pressure.
Thus, in my view, things like the Taiping rebellion might as well be explained with the Weston-LaBarrean concept of crisis cults (cf. ghost dancers in the U.S.; boxer rebellion; maji-maji revolt).