Dante1214 wrote...
hermitVI wrote...
Dante1214 wrote...
hermitVI wrote...
Aud1o Blood wrote...
flamethrower=impractical.
only good for razing the enemy countryside.
I don't care about Practicality! AS I SAID,"anythings Fine as long as IT KILLS!" and If Ever I'd want to KILL someone, I can use a flamethrower to
BURN THE LIVING HELL OUTTA HIM!!!
You can beat someone with a flamethrower with knives.
Not a very impressive 1on1 weapon.
I'll just have to dismember both hands of whoever my enemy is with a CHAINSAW before I move on to the FIERY FINISH!
...
You know, at that point, the burning only serves to get rid of the evidence.
Also, considering how unwieldy chainsaws are, you would still lose to a person with knives.
Or any other weapon.
Or no weapons at all.
Why are you so vigorous in saying that my weapon of choice will lose to someone who only has a mere knife?!
It's not like I'm going to face my opponent/s head on without thinking, carrying such Heavy weapons all at the same time!
I still prefer killing someone from a distance without the target knowing what HIT 'im!
I'm not really a fan of torture, I'm just hypothetically saying that if, "IF" I'd KILL somebody, I'll make sure that THAT SOMEBODY will taste HELL on EARTH and SUFFER EXCRUCIATING PAIN upon DYING! (I must really HATE that Person for me to DO something like that) I'm not even implying that there's gonna be a fight..so please don't force your "Knife" idea to me.
I accept the fact that I can Lose to someone with knives in a 1on1 fight (nobody could really tell what can happen in the battlefield) so I'll end it at that. I hope you understand my point now.
I'll go with a gun over a knife at any given day!!