Does arguing with assholes piss you off?

Wow I just learned all that fallacy stuff in college, but I forgot about them lol gotta re-take the class cause I failed it. Anyways yeah I hate people who rather than attacking the argument attack the person which is just wrong. Also people who start an argument with none or lacking evidence to support their claim and even when they are proven wrong they don't except it. A good example would be my mom lol she never listens to a damn thing I say, she's so damn hard-headed but I get it from her otherwise we wouldn't argue all the time.

I think that's REALLY self explanatory. YES! Assholes piss me off. Talking with them pisses me off. Arguing with them makes my wanna piss on their faces.
Assholes are so full of shit (lol)!

Most of my topic names don't automatically tell you what the OP is talking about. I try to figure out either clever or attractive names for topics which still have a little something to do with the thread itself.

It also seems that some of you were answering the topic name and not what I wrote in the OP.

I also added, NAME THE FALLACY to the OP.

Yes, a whole lot of times. Especially at work where most egos collide.

When we have board meetings and have a roundtable discussion I usually go straight to the point of an argument. But occasionally when we make our case some asshole butts in with the line of "So this is the same as..." and gives a situation that is wholly farcical to use and compare to the case presented.

The most common fallacy I encounter is the fallacy of equivocation, or in more layman-esque terms, fallacy of uncompatible comparison, which involves an asshole use the same pattern as "If god is love and love is blind then...", which makes his argument really pissful.

But when assholes make that statement, I just let him finish and give the best treatment of a false statement my Ethics professor taught me - in my coldest, most sarcastic tone, I usually say "Thanks for your participation, we appreciate it. Any much more better ideas, people?" which makes the asshole feel pretty bad but without you breaking their necks.

Yeah, arguing with TehMikuruSlave does piss me off.

This is often one of the most annoying things to me in an argument. It's more plain stubbornness than fallacy, because it isn't really providing any argument at all, it's just pretty much saying, "fuck all that 'facts' stuff, I'm obviously correct, and even if I'm incorrect, I will dictate reality so that I AM correct." Often in the face of a plain fact that contradicts their original point.
This seems to come up often with older people who are, "set in their ways." Which, by the way, is by no means an excuse for anything, and is just shoddy reasoning old assholes use so that they don't feel like old assholes for things like their racism and ignorance.
But that's probably another topic.
It just annoys me when I say something in argument like, "well, my point is this, and here is three different, reliable sources to prove my point," and the other person either refutes them completely or just says something like, "well, I don't know about all that."

It goes along with the generally annoying attitude that the truth is pretty much irrelevant.
But Ad hominem and Non Sequitur are things I find really annoying, because they have nothing to do with the argument itself. It's the argumentative equivalent of jingling yours keys or flashing something shiny to distract a child, only it seems to work on adults.
I am, however, not above using either if they are useful in the pursuit of The Truth.
What truly annoys me in argument is anything that refutes The Truth.

I am invincible, there are no weaknesses in my style of debate. My "shit" is certainly not "weak".

On a serious note, I don't believe I have any one thing that angers me, most of the time when someone does something illogical I can point it out and use it to my advantage, so even things like getting overly emotional just tends to end up being a positive for me. I'm not a huge fan of people who only respond to a few points when in an argument, ignoring everything else which has been said because they can't come up with a counter... I think it's why I find I have to repeat myself at times.

updated OP for the fallacy challenged

No it usually gets me banned.