g-money wrote...
@(>'.')>¿;=: The claymore is reputed to be a seven body blade... close enough if you ask me. I'm assuming the nodachi can also do the same.
@zeKer_pencil: I'm impressed with your above average knowledge in hand to hand weapons. But if it was me, I'd go for a gladius than a falcata, especially if you're fighting at extreme close range, swinging isn't as practical as stabbing, and that was what the gladius was meant to do, stab straight into the spine.
As for the falx, I find that it looks aesthetically pleasing but overall there are far better weapons out there to pull away shields or break them - the mace would be perfect to smash a shield in. I just can't imagine a thin blade that the falx sports would cleave any METAL shield in two, and the fact that the polearm is only three feet long proves to be disadvantageous against more conventional polearms of pole length over five feet.
hey thanks g-money... im a weapons fan you know... its not only melee im interested...
as for the claymore, yeah it is a seven body blade thats powerful enough to splice even a man in two or a small lightweight shield such as the buckler. well the nodachi is different. it was created for anti-cavalry where the wielder would slice the legs of the horse or both horse and rider. its cutting strength is good, but the mobility is what its lacking. one thing about the claymore too... ITS SO DAMN HEAVY! i had to sling it over my shoulder just to carry it (the scabbard isnt heavy, its the freakin' blade!). pops recently ordered a new falchion blade but i doubt its anything but a falcata....
the gladius is most effective in up close fights because a roman legionnaire can cover his body with his body sized shield, concealing the sword in the process. not only does the opponent unable to tell where the sword will strike, he cannot also attack directly because of the large shield covering the user. i gotta hand it to the romans though.
for the falx, its true that the polearm is short and you are vulnerable to attack, but it is very able to strike a shield, sometimes splitting it in two (IF WELL MADE), and yanking it out of an opponents hands and the falx user can strike again with impudity...
a mace is also good against shields as a single strike can either smash, crumple or split a shield.
knives as i know are most effective in very up close situations where a standard length blade is at a disadvantage. it is also noted that very agile people prefer the knife because a sword would only slow them down. a knife user would either get close after a swing of the weapon, grapple and stab, slice, or simply stabbing the crap out of the opponent...