obviouspam wrote...
Because it's not about destruction. Being a masochist is different from the primary goal of a smoker. People seem to have a illogical view of that. It's like going up to a football player and ask "Why do you enjoy breaking your limbs and tearing muscle?" That's not why they play and we know it.
People smoke because the benefits in the present outweigh the future possible cons. I say possible because it really is just a probability. Depending on your genetic resistance and frequency of use it could do just about nothing or kill you in less than four years. Especially if you have an obscene amount of lung tissue from hard labor, killing off 3/4ths of your lungs when you have 5x the volume of a normal person kinda skews things. But the future is a sketchy thing to grasp regardless how much we tout the concept of cause/effect since regardless of what people have experienced in the past it's not real till it hits close to home or we experience it first hand.
Argument aside, I personally avoid smoke at all cost. I inhale by mere coincidence far too much for my taste and have a large degree of paranoia about sense loss after contact for any period of time. Most of the issue I have with smoke is from previously having very strong allergic reaction with common allergens which made my lungs at least a fourth full of fluid. The very possibility of going back to that by choice...is not something I can deal with. To relieve stress or clear my head a 6 minute mile is all I require as it just about renders me useless but can't be upset when you can't think.
I don't advocate smoking but hearing the tired argument of "oh, it's bad for you" is a very weak one. It is on average a vaild point when put up against empirical evidence but hearing it without a calm, neutral point of view along with tempered reading into the scientific studies, not the theory or conclusions but the numbers themselves it devolves into a playground child's argument. Much like the American Heart Association's attack on salt. Salt is essential and no study has proved that it does anything, in fact the human body is actually really great at dealing with it as it is after all as essential as water, there's a reason we have a large percentage of tongue cells dedicated to recognizing it. It's just that attacking salt is easier than attacking the foods that commonly go with large portions of it...is harder to work against.
Which causes the main problem with science, the knowledge doesn't condense down into a single sentence but we do to it anyway.
So kudos Kamisama_no_Loli prove us wrong and live longer with smoking and less stress buildup than otherwise or if you're unlucky let's have the tact to not say anything later since enough of us have been yelling "told you so" twenty years too early. But just don't smoke around me.
Look's like copy pasta, but i like it, and i doubt one smoke a day will take 20 years off my life, but what do i know, im a collage student :roll: