[Locked] Some Random things I've made

Lately I've been toying around with 3D Custom Girl some what, and I've been toying around with the characters I've created to make some Art like things, and well l I guess I'll post them here.

I'll be the first to admit the quality is not the best but oh well.



Edit:
Fixed the spelling Errors from the original image(To see look at Spoiler):

That's nice.

So you posed some girls and took a screenshot?

I agree with Tegumi that it's nice.

May just be me/my PSP, but on the pic there are two errors.

Isn't "someone" spelled wrong...? "somone".

And is the word "on", at the end of all the text missing... or was it left out intentionally, with no need to include?

Either way I like the actual pics. I figured I'd just say something so that "flaws" can be corrected. But as the other two said, it is nice.

It could possibly be due to the fact that I was blitzed when I made that last night. Easy fixes.

Edit:

This is just a screen cap nothing really fancy done to it except the added text.

That is impressive. It's laden with artistic effort.

Teg, you can't use sarcasm with angelus... he won't get it.

dude, this isn't art; you're an idiot if you think it deserves to be called so.

Waar do you purposely find something I post and just rip on it? Don't you have anything better to do?

Also I've seen worse examples of "Art" before. If you've ever been to a Modern Art Museum you will know what I'm talking about.

So, you're bashing modern art? They actually made the art, either by sculpting, photography, drawing, etc; not used some fucking computer program they torrented, ripped the images, put them against a black background, and added a caption. Visiting an art museum doesn't make you an expert on what is and what isn't art, friend.

I'm drawn to stupidity; I believe God put me on this earth to mock people like you.

Seriously though, someone linked me to this justification for 23rd trimester abortion.

I went to the museum of modern art in New York, and MOMA was about 300 times more original than you. You didn't even do anything; a program did it for you, explain to me how this is art?

you could simply admit you wanted the user base to blow you again instead of this horse shit denial, I'm sure real art critiques would tell me I'm wrong though; you truly are an artist... (btw, I am adopting a dramatic/humor tool called sarcasm, in case you missed it)

Whether modern art is good or bad, at least they built it from the ground up, so to speak. To put it from my perspective, this is about as artistic as a some random guy taking a screenshot from WoW.

D:
. . .
._.
. . .
=|

Eh. . .

I feel. . . as though this thread won't end well. . .

< <' But I'll sorta stay quiet, let it be.

Talking about what "art" is would require hours of "explanation" and possibly "discussion" that would be wasted upon "people" who believe the "ability" to "criticize" art is "achieved" after having been to an "art museum" sometime in their life. I've seen someone turn "trash" into "installation art" that looked "better" than this.

tl;dr "Nice pic". See, I can use "quotation marks" to employ "sarcasm" to make me seem "intelligent" too!

lol.. talking about art... err, i mean "Art"..


I'm agree with this one.

For me, art is something from nothing.

EDIT:
Oh, i'm sorry... It's a wrong assumption, well this also because how you respond Angelus Lapsus.
If i were you, i might respond like this:


i wonder how everyone respond if you said that...

I just love it how you guys fly off the handle and make assumptions, and twist things people say to suit you better. I never said that I am an art critic, I have been to 3 maybe four different Art museums in my life two of which where modern art, I was an Art major in High school, I've taken art History classes, But that is beside the point, What the point is. What I have said about modern art is my opinion. What someone says about a piece of art is there opinion, it is not a stone cold fact.

As for my opinion if you want real art, look at Gothic Architecture, IMO that is art, not some random lines across a canvas that someone painted, that looks like something I did in preschool. Everyone has there own taste of what is and what is not art. It's not for one person to say what is and what is not. It's for that one person to decide on what they think not what everyone thinks.

The root of the problem:

The solution:
Change it to not say "Art".

Hi, me again.

Heh, "make assumptions". Ever heard of circumstantial evidence before? All we've done is use the known to form conclusions about the unknown, which I can assume you of all people to have done right here. You assume we "fly off the handle", though you really have no evidence, circumstantial or otherwise, to rightfully say that we've lost our tempers or go overboard. And yes, we may twist things to suit us, e.g. those screw caps on bottles, but with you at least, we don't even have to.

Also, your actions contradict your point here. You say that "some random lines across a canvas that someone painted, that looks like something I did in preschool" is not art, but what you did was use a program with pre-made shapes, colours, effects etc to piece together a picturee that could have, to be honest, be done by any existence that could press buttons and work a mouse, IMO.

While I can agree with the fact that art is subjective, you mean to use some unknown 'worse examples of "Art"' in order to try to give rise to your point. Since we don't know exactly what you personally would call "Art", and because you have said that "[e]veryone has there[sic] own taste of what is and what is not art", how are we supposed to know whether it is good or not, or even art in our opinions? You assume that we have the same views as you, which can't be possible due to opinions being "for that one person to decide on what they think not what everyone thinks."

Sure, we can tell the difference between fact and fiction. What we can see for a fact is that you are bashing art, implying that you have the credentials to bash art, and brushing those credentials off to suggest modesty for your own self-aggrandisement and attempt to validate your argument.

tl;dr Penis.

Wait wait wait, since "everyone has their own taste of what is and what is not art", why are you trying to tell us what art is? That's a terrible, terrible argument to make, and should try to not do that again.


Back up there sparky, no one ever said you were an art critic. What we said was that you can't compare actual art with a program that does all the hard work for you. You're obviously trying to impress us with those art history classes you've taken, but I don't think it helped you at all, as you continue to blunder about what is and is not art. You have stated over and over that art is an opinion, but you keep trying to convince us to change our opinion of your "art". I was also not even aware you can major in something in high school; you couldn't where I came from, but hell, I might be the black sheep in this case.

I'd also like to point out that all that school you've done didn't help you a lick when it came to grammar and spelling. You don't capitalize letters after a comma, and you can't just end a sentence with a fragment. "But that is beside the point, What the point is." is not a valid ending for a sentence. If you had said "But that is beside the point,the point is is that I want you to accept my shitty computer program jpgs for art.", I wouldn't be bitching at you now.

Hold on a second, before you all starts off on this whole path yet again. I never outright said this is art, as I remember I said "art like" as in suggesting that it is and is not art at the same time. I'm not trying to force anyone to think the way I do. So get that out of your head right now. I am voicing my opinion on what really is art, and what is not in my opinion. You are free to think what you want. Also if someone can lock this because of a derailment into something that was not intended.

First, "Art like" is a vague phrase and it implies that the subject is on the "art" side. Second, it is impossible to be art and not be art at the same time. It either has artistic merit or it doesn't.