mGARANDEUR1 wrote...
The point is, it would run faster on XP because more RAM is available.
Naturally.
But again, you're contrasting operating systems like they are on an equal level. You have to take into account that XP was first released October 25, 2001. Vista on the other hand, was released on November 8, 2006. With Vista has come a wave of things (that to be honest, should have been released with systems like XP)
And Windows is now pushing Vista onto OEMs. At work recently, Matthew (my boss) had a chat with me about Vista and XP. Software, driver and peripheral manufacturers have basically been given the go-ahead to slow XP compatibility in a bid to move everyone to Vista. This is much like 98 -> XP. They made some versions of InstallShield that rejected 98 as an operating system that was compatible with the program. OEMs (us techies that build your computers) only have a limited ammount of time left for XP, as soon Microsoft will stop distributing copies and force us to sell Vista. This is a blow to the industry, who like to offer a lightweight system VS a resource hog with support for that one program.
Trust Microsoft, eh? Limiting choices is what they do best.