Arizona's Immigration Law: Racism or Security?

http://www.mail-archive.com/ip@v2.listbox.com/msg09586.html


Read the above.

People (republikkkans) feel entitled to stuff the really don't deserve. I know how people say illegal immigration doing cheap labor work brings down the prices but why not go after the the one exploiting them for the cheap labor. I know some people don't come here to settle and contribute but we have to consider why there doing it and why.(drugs are illegal)

If i were in Arizona i would probably be pulled over because my well my skin tone is dark brown(I'm black and of Mexican descent)

So you mean every Sicilian, Greek, Romanian, Portugese, Italian from Southern Italy, Albanian, French from Southern France will be pulled over also. They have dark skinned very close or darker than Mexicans. How racist!!

oh yes they will get pulled over, but how many of them are there compared to Mexicans or any one from south of the border in Arizona? who is going to be getting the brunt of the harm from the law and who is it obviously targeting?

they are not going to be randomly pulling over some random guy from Scotland or any white person for that matter. whether or not they are an illegal immigrant.

Too bad for these people because of the color of their skin.

http://sluggerotoole.com/2007/05/18/z-visa-for-illegal-immigrants/

Yes, yes it is.

What's your point?

The fact you REFUSED to surmise, these people are everyday Caucasian by race so how can the law be racist. Discriminatory yes; racist no.

Mexican ancecestry is either Indian and/or Hispanic. If 50 to 100% Hispanic ancestry; their ancestry is the same as the Greek, Sicilian, Portugese, etc..; that is if you know your world geography and history. (HINT* All are countries of the continent of Europe including The true origins of the name España and its cognates "Spain" and "Spanish" are disputed. The ancient Roman name for Iberia, Hispania, may derive from poetic use of the term Hesperia to refer to Spain, reflecting Greek perception of Italy as a "western land" or "land of the setting sun" (Hesperia) and Spain, being still further west, as Hesperia ultima.[5]

Spain conquered most (except Brazil was owned by the Portugese) of South, Central Americas and southern parts of North America (Florida, Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California. The Spanish emigrated and lived in these parts, married with some of the Indians or stayed pure Spanish/Hispanic.

If these Mexicans can prove they are 100% (+-) Yanqui, Aztec and/or Mayan then it can/might be considered racist. I would consider the law racist.

The reason the Feds don't do anything about the illegals is because

Republicans want the support from businesses that use that cheap labor.

Democrats want the votes from the Hispanic community as they are poised to overtake Blacks as the largest minority.

The vermin in Washington view votes and cheap labor as more important than you.

It's the most basic form of racial profiling. Which is illegal under federal laws.
Sadly, at a state level it seems they can avert it.

Which makes me angry, sad, and fearful of what our country stands for.

I'm angry too, except for the reason that a leader of a foreign nation was allowed to step into Congress and criticize what the majority of Americans support. Then get a standing ovation.

Thaaaaaaaaaaank Youuuuuuuuu!