neko-chan wrote...
Chlor wrote...
neko-chan wrote...
Again, read Ben Franklin: "Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both."
Ben Franklin was an idiot for saying that, I would give up my right to be a douchebag just for the hell of it if that meant preventing a violent response.
Follow that logic, if I told you to shut the hell up and accept my point of view or I'll kill you that means you'd shut the hell up (and create a paradox in the process).
No, follow that logic and I wouldn't flip you the finger for no reason if I thought you'd punch back. Not only are my decision to flip you the finger stupid and uncalled for, but it's also provocative.
Very much like this entire situation.
Rbz wrote...
Chlor wrote...
Think about the reaction the danish drawings and the artwork of Lars Vilks did, these were drawings, humorous satires of their prophet, this lead to the death of about 30 people. Now think what the reaction on this will be.
But were those 30 deaths the fault of Lars Vilks? Was he the problem? I maintain that the problem is the extremists who show themselves to be the barbarians that they are, all because someone drew a picture.
Agreed, the problem wasn't Lars Vilks but instead the extremists, but there is no denying that it was Lars Vilks who triggered it all right?
Rbz wrote...
In this quran burning scenario, I see the burners as a lesser evil. These people who say, "You must respect my religion,
or else", should not be catered to. Draw muhammad day was similar in that it was a giant middle finger to those who would impose their will on us.
Indeed the burners are not the ones killing anyone, but provoking someone like this,
knowing that they'll respond in a violent way is just stupid.
Rbz wrote...
Either way, quran burning as a way of honoring the victims of 9/11 is moronic.
I couldn't agree more.