Captain Badass wrote...
But seriously, how do you know that they're better?
I studied and finished medicine (did not take the boards, so I'm not an MD), and that was what my AMERICAN classmates told me. While, on average, a US hospital has much better facilities (obviously) the level of training is another matter. The more expensive asian schools produce better graduates than an equivalent/average cost US school (which was why I had american classmates in the first place; for the same amount of cash, they'd rather study abroad). My theory is that there's nothing like working with crap equipment to bring out the basics. I mean, when you're forced to make a diagnosis/treatment without having any expensive lab equipment, you really have to know your stuff. When I see medical TV dramas, I say to myself, "man, these guys are _spoiled_."
Which is why I suggest going to an ISO compliant hospital -- at the very least, the facilities comparable to the ones in the US. High tech facilities + doctors who fucking know their business + third world rate = win.
To be fair, the top notch doctors in the US are really much better. Locally, the only field that I know of that's actually better to train here is infectious diseases (malaria, tuberculosis and the like isn't that common in the US). The best plastic surgeons in the US will likely beat the pants out of any third world plastic surgeon. Of course, the question now is: can you afford the best doctors in the US, or are you just going to settle for an average one?
Another "to be fair" anecdote:
When I was still going to med school, a gas chromotograph was newly bought and introduced to the lab. The consultant (a 50+ year old doctor) lecturing was struggling with it. Then, an american student offered to help. It was like fucking magic -- he moved through the machine and the process like he had been using it all his life. I (and the consultant) was very fucking impressed.