Silence of the Yanderes wrote...
Yes, I still lie.
I don't believe lying is inherently wrong, as many people claim it is. I think that the negative connotation comes about because of most of the time, if somebody finds out you're lying, chances are you were hiding it because you had done something bad, or were planning to etc. Basically you were lying for the wrong reasons. To protect yourself, for example. And I do think this sort of lying is (mostly) wrong.
But there are many other types of lies. Lies to stop others worrying, lies to protect others (physically or emotionally), lies to make people happy, lies to help yourself deal with something. These types of lies are not wrong, in fact most of the time they are a good thing to do. For instance, if someone you don't like confessed to you, don't you think it would be nicer to turn them down with some reason other than 'I don't like you'?
Morality doesn't have a universal definition, often times it's contradicting and shifting based off the situation and circumstances.
I would grant you the statement "lying is absent of morality in and by itself".
Can you really claim, that hurting others doesn't hurts yourself, such as disappointing a parent/peer, by extension, that lying to not hurt others involves trying to not hurt yourself? That often times, attempts to hurt others is brought about by being hurt. And that people find it easier to hurt strangers over those closest to them for how big of an emotional backlash causes in personal pain.
Silence of the Yanderes wrote...
There are also lies which really don't have any bearing on morality, and are just to adhere to socially acceptable conversation or to avoid meaningless conversation. If your parents asked you what you did Friday night, would you honestly answer 'I masturbated to some incestuous hentai' even if that was the truth? Would you ever tell you're girlfriends parents 'I have licked your daughters nipples'? I for one would certainly not, unless I was very, very drunk.
Your masturbation example, is an example of trying to protect your social bonds and emotions from being damaged, but an unwillingness to drop something others see as socially unacceptable but you don't share those views with them. An example of a difference in morality.
Silence of the Yanderes wrote...
-not quoting anything specific-
..and..
Taltharius wrote...
A few people have mentioned "benign lies". While I won't argue with their stance on the matter, my current position is the extreme opposite. Meaning "harmful truths", which means that I tell the truth in a rather agitating way. I figure that there's no point in trying to sugar-coat certain subjects that really don't need it. It makes people angry, I know that much, but I could care less on what their reactions are. For me, sugar-coating the truths I speak makes it less than it is. And I hate making understatements.
I figure you both might give me the opposite answer, but I'd like to pose a conflict I, personally, don't have an answer for, even after 10 years.
A game I played awhile back, I won't use the name, if you know the scene, then you know it, if you don't, it doesn't count as a spoiler, either way, it's an old game and a minor scene in scope of the games length.
In the game, a character, a young girl, is possessed by a monster intending to kill the entire village. In an attempt to save his daughter, the father tries to talk her out of her possession. She proceeds to slay him. The players party fights and defeats her, expelling the monster, but the toll on her body has pushed her past being saved from death. As she dies in the party's arms, unable to see, she ask of her fathers, lying not too far from her, well being, only remembering her fathers presence within her possession.
It is here that a prompt comes up... Tell her the well being of her father, as she dies, the fact that she had killed her father in her possessed state. Or, tell her a lie, making her last moments a complete lie, sending her off with a false sense of security that can never be taken back, a lie the perpetrator has to live with their entire life with.
(Side note, as for the specific context of the prompt, I can't remember (been 6-7 years, and again, was minor in comparison to the overall story) but the above serves it's purpose well enough so I am using it.)
My question is this, what would you give as an answer, and why would you give it, does it completely agree with all your perceptions of morality (that applies to this situation)?