Chlor wrote...
Nashrakh wrote...
>Implying voting actually makes a difference
>Implying voting is the only legitimate way of "influencing politics"
Yes, I'm implying that voting makes a difference, I don't know what assumed fake-democracy/dictatorship you believe you live under(Germany right? I think I saw that somewhere but I can be mistaken) but over here votes are actually counted.
And no, voting is not the only legitimate way of making a difference, but it sure is the easiest if you don't really get yourself into politics and get a position where you are able to hold some power. But since our OP didn't even vote I highly doubt that he holds a strong enough political position to be able to have an impact on who people are going to vote for.
So yeah, for your average citizen voting is the only way to be able to change things.
Do the words 'simple plurality' and 'proportional representation' mean anything to you? How about 'coalitions'? I don't think voting is worthless, but at least one of your votes in Germany (under AMS) counts for a whole lot more than in Westminster elections.
I agree that voting is the principle means of affecting government; for instance, trade unions have been sidelined, pressure groups are by-and-large fobbed off, and unlike in Germany, the official petitions website counts for nothing bar minimal exposure. We desperately need PR, mind you. If the Lib Dems can't secure it this term, the buzz that has surrounded this election shan't be replicated again, and the apathy will reinstate itself.