Carnes344 wrote...
To me, saying reading loli hentai creates child molesters is like saying playing violent video games creates killers. I haven't seen any scientific studies that prove either of those. Though that being said, I refuse to download any loli hentai for my fear of the FBI knocking down my door at the same moment.
I wouldn't agree that (the idea that games/loli make killers/molesters) but I don't think the Loli issue ends here. I'm not going to argue the perfection of the legal system either. But there is a slight edge here which is the following:
It can be that people just like Loli drawings or it can be that they like
the real stuff and they use Loli as an alternative. If we face the first one, the only discussion would be whether it is moral to create underage characters in sexual scenarios. The strong counter-argument being «They are drawings, not real people». Personally, as risking a brave and courageous negative vote, I think it is a bit odd that you specifically like Hentai characters that are made specefically to look young but whatever, I won't lose sleep over it. In that case, to each their own, we might as well move on. However, in the second scenario, Loli does not make child molesters but child molesters
find Loli. In that case, the law makers have a point.
Naturally, I'm not saying all Loli people are child molesters but it seems quite dumb to say there aren't any. In all likelihood, there are. The perhaps positive side to this would be that Loli can be a replacement to supress the urge to criminal action. Either way, I think the debate is open to both ways. Neither side can end it with a few sentences.