ThorW wrote...
Ethil wrote...
It is easy to say that it is blown out of proportion when you 1. does not know shit about how it actually is.
The main reason I say this is blown out of proportion is due to the fact that it's getting more attention than it should. There have been other disasters that get less attention and are worse than this one was.
I'm not saying it's not horrible what happened to the poor people there, I'm just saying that there's a bit too much coverage on it.
Too much coverage? Instead of thinking "why does this get so much attention when this disaster didn't", isn't it better to say "finally they give the disaster the attention it actually needs"?
ThorW wrote...
Ethil wrote...
2. is a fat bastard that never have and probably never will face a disaster like it.
I love how everyone resorts to calling someone a fat bastard on the internet...
And no, I doubt I will ever face a disaster like this. There's no telling if I will or won't, but based on where I live, probably not. I'm just lucky that I live where I do and not where natural disasters occur more often.
Hmeh, I didn't "resort" to call you a fat bastard; it was not even a insult, just a mean to say that we are all (not just you) people who can be fat and bastards, since we will never experience poverty, starvation or anything like it, unless we'd put us in that situation ourselves.
ThorW wrote...
Ethil wrote...
Also, even if people were dirty and poor and it wasn't as nice to live there as where you live just because you were born lucky, it was not as bad as it is now: children crawling over the rubble of their former homes and the dead bodies of their friends and family, too shocked to even try to figure out where to go or what to do.
I agree, it's worse than it was before because now there is rubble instead of homes and a lot of people died (not to mention the aftershocks that hit). But the fact of the matter is that Haiti was in need of assistance before this earthquake (not as much as now but still). There were already children dying, children without parents or homes, people poor and barely living.
Some of these people you see were starving and suffering beforehand. The only reason you suddenly care about these people now is the fact that something happened to make their situation go from bad to horrible.
Ok, people didn't realize the situation was bad before, because of ignorance, yes. The fact that they now got a rather violent wake-up call and started doing things to help out, shouldn't it be considered a good thing instead?
ThorW wrote...
Since it always takes a disaster to find human kindness I tend to ignore when others say that they care about people who were involved in such a disaster. Because generally, they will only help someone after something bad happened.
If you wish to condemn me for my opinion on the matter, then fine, I don't care. But, if you think you're better than me because you
say you care, then you should think twice.
As I said, ofc the fact that people did not realize how bad the situation was before the earthquake, or simply did not care is not a good thing. Then again, the fact that they are helping now when the situation has gone from bad to worse should be encouraged instead of people pointing at earlier ignorance.
I do not condemn you, actually, I do not care what you do, and I certainly do not consider myself a better person than you, since, as I said in a earlier post, I have not, and most likely will not donate any money.
The only thing that actually bothered me with your post, and the only thing I wanted to say is that it is, imho, wrong to say that "it is blown out of proportion". The fact that it is given so much attention, the fact that the coverage is so extensive is not something that you should call bad just because "there has been other disasters that didn't get as much attention". Ofc it isn't a good thing that some disasters aren't given the attention they deserve, but now when Haiti is, why not encourage this instead of pointing fingers?