doswillrule wrote...
Forgive me, but some of you aren't really answering the question: shouldn't we be favouring languages like Chinese or Japanese, which are of more practical use, rather than French, Spanish etc?
A couple of people cited neighbouring countries, but I think most people who are learning languages in schools are looking for them to further career opportunities if anything, not to speak a bit while on holiday. With the nature of modern business and trade, and the prominence of Asia in this, I think most people recognise their prominence; but then, are some people learning languages which they think will be more useful than is true - this all harks back to the question. I'll emphasise what I said: those 'big three' languages may be widely spoken, but the countries with which they are associated are also largely English-speaking; it's brilliant to be able to communicate with people in their native language and there are still those who don't speak English in these countries, but you can still get along fine most of the time without.
You mean because China and Japan are 2nd and 3rd in terms of GDP? Maybe if you want a more business view of things but people are learning other languages because there are more speakers. But I agree that there should be a general importance in the Asian language, not only because they can be used in advanced countries but they're few of the most hardest languages to learn that is so alienated for English speakers. There's a growing number of non-Asian speakers and wouldn't be bad if there were more. Hell, there are even Asians in America that don't even know their own native tongue.
I also noticed that some people who took classes in Asian countries learn other Asian languages respectively; like in Korean schools people learn Japanese/Chinese and vice versa. Is it a mandatory choice or do people just take it on high demand?