Please Educate Yourselves (v2)

No it's not...
that is your assumption.....

You may disagree on some of my statements and I may disagree on yours...
but then again all you do is just nitpick the small details and forcing this to go on even further than it really is...


Really brilliant.

*Note.. I mistakenly wrote science together with the other beliefs so sorry.. that was my bad."

If you can disagree on something, then you can argue over it. If it can be argued, then there is "argument value" in it.

You're contradicting yourself again.

Along with,


and a snippet out of something you posted earlier in post # 2462868


(lol)
This is why it's like talking to a wall.

Im guessing you haven't read ALL my comments....

when I make a mistake I kindly accept it and progress further...

You make it sound like as if there is no way I can change my mind later on...

Assumptions and even more assumptions.....

"talking to a wall"..... really nice word for ignorant people.

You pick out all the small details from every sentence and try to put them together.
Nitpicking must be a bad habit for you.

Pointing out your clear contradictory statements you make in a desperation to save your ass isn't nitpicking.
Also refer to #2494052,




I'm sorry, you're incorrect. There is an exact reason I don't quote an entire post. The sentence I quote is the sentence I'm responding to.

I save my ass by admitting my mistakes on what I wrote and I admit them to others as well..... that is something even YOU can agree on, or not?

Ok since you talk about math here .. then here is an example...
1+_= 2..... you quote specific sentences without responding to the rest and thus making your quotes not exactly add up, making it pointless to quote something without adding in the rest of the details as well....

I have pointed out:
" and Science to prove which theory is better and which of those religions"
a) Science is not a religion. (religion is faith)

"a debate between Christians, Muslims... and Science to prove which theory..."
b) Religious views are not theories, they're religious views.
(Religion is not based on observations.)

"a debate between Christians, Muslims... and Science"
It is impossible to make observations on "God". Therefore, it is impossible to make any scientifically correct statements on "God".
leading to:
c) Science has no domain in religion.

Lastly:
d) As science has no domain in religion, it cannot debate with religion.
("There are no basis for your views" -- "that's correct, it's faith.")

Can you disagree with a, b, c or d? If so, elaborate.
Can you admit that there is a great deal wrong with that sentence, as pointed out by a, b, c and d?

https://www.fakku.net/viewtopic.php?t=62159&start=60#2494237


At the end of my comment I noted I made a mistake by adding science together with the religions...
You should be careful because I believe you tend to rush things forward without double checking other peoples posts.

If that was the ONLY thing you were just discussing about then you have been babbling the whole time because of a mistake which I admit and apologize...

Which you've only put in about 30 seconds ago.
I repeatedly read my own posts, along with the posts I disagree with. That's very dishonest.
^
^ by that I mean, I sit here, I read over your posts. I continue to read while I wait for you to post. When I'm done reading, I refresh the page and reread it. I see all edits you make.

But aside from that, it's not the fact that you've incorrectly grouped it. It's that it doesn't belong there, period. (And that's only among other things.)



Ditto. And read above.



As I said, there is a SPECIFIC reason I quote only SPECIFIC things. It's because I'm talking about those SPECIFIC things SPECIFICALLY. (I even told you that)

Yet, I'm instructed to "double check posts"

All the sources on that site seem to link to articles in the opinion section of newspapers, magazines, or less-credible websites. This website is not nearly as credible as the rest of the links in your post, and I think I have shown an apt amount of evidence. Are we no longer having a discussion?

I'm not here to argue with you.

I believe you would save yourself a lot of time and trouble is you eliminated the link from your thread.

You may even get your thread "stickied" for improving it's credibility and making it more helpful than inflammatory.

I re-edit them so I can add something with my comment....
when I do make a mistake I write it down later...
I say double check because YOU forget about the previous posts I posted...
30 seconds ago? More like over an hour and a half ago when I am not mistaken..

and when you mean it doesn't belong there is that a fact or just an assumption?

I only replied to the post he made about religion and science and nothing else...

Luke, I'm guessing it's not really to draw information from, just to say "these are all dried up, think of something new."
But yeah, it would just be easiest to remove it.

Dollci,
"and when you mean it doesn't belong there is that a fact or just an assumption?"
It is a fact.

"30 seconds ago? More like over an hour and a half ago when I am not mistaken.."
You only made the post you edited 1 hour and 20 minutes ago. I screenshot that if you want.

No replying and quoting someones comment IS something that belongs there....

whatever the person talks about, you can add something to it or say something similar since it is being MENTIONED in a discussion..

that my friend is an assumption and not a fact..

Oh. Were you saying, your post doesn't belong there or science doesn't belong in your post? Your subjects are ruthlessly unmentioned. Yes, ruthlessly.

Kinda hard to know what you're talking about when your subject is "it".

Also,


No, I read every post. Even the ones that aren't in this thread.


Oh, by the way, the exact time you edit a post that quotes a post of mine, it's displayed in my notifications.

7 minutes ago,> "because of a mistake which I admit and apologize..."
54 minutes ago,> "*Note.. I mistakenly wrote science together with the other beliefs so sorry.. that was my bad." Haha oh wow.

You're a liar, and not a good one.

Then, on top of that, you've edited entire posts:

"What's your point?" (that was your entire post)
turns into
"if you are trying to say something different then say it....
Don't even try to stretch this one out...
Just say what you mean and lets wrap this one up..."

Do you care so much about being right that you go through all your posts and change them from what they were to the exact opposite?
Covering truths, going from an utterly ignorant and provoking stance to "oh, please, I just want to finish this"
Filthy.

You guys should make a new thread...

and bump that... lol

I only slightly re-edit them if I need to add something....
I still hold on to my arguments because I don't need to beat around the bush...

Like I said I admit I make some mistakes here and there and I write down my apologies later....

Like I said stop stretching this one out.. your only making this matter worse...

1) Changing a post to say the exact opposite is not a slight edit. Stop trying to play that out.

2) This thread was more than halfway down the page before you replied to it. It is dead, it was dead, and I was going to leave it dead. You reply to a dead thread to tell me I'm dragging it out? Isn't that... dragging it out yourself?

I wasnt even aware that this thread was dead....
and im not dragging it on..

You're posting aren't you? It seems to me like I'm quoting more posts...
You can stop replying any time, but you choose not to.
There's no reason to continue to reply, but you choose to.
That's called dragging it out.

Then it's settled then.