Fiery_penguin_of_doom wrote...
Pocru wrote...
...now, Im not a religious person by any definition. I get mad at most all of the catholic subbranches, Its getting harder and harder to view Islam impartially, and I just dont agree with all of the views of most every religion. There are contradictions and things that are unfair, and just plain ridiculous.
...but I'm not an atheist. I believe in god, but only for one reason, really. I've heard all of the atheist arguments, and none of them have ever addressed this, so Im curious if any of the many atheists on this site might have an idea.
The reason I'm not an atheist is because it had to start SOMEWHERE.
All of the theories behind man's creation, really...
like, for the big bang. What first created that atom that exploded to create all life? How did that thing just appear?
that's the biggest and only real convincing argument I have for the existence of god. I'd like to hear some people's theories opposing it.
thanks!
In a nutshell. Theists believe nothing existed (except God) then God created everything. Atheists (tend to) believe nothing existed except, a basketball size chunk of super dense, compacted matter which exploded. Congratulations, its the same except for the minor details which still leaves the questions "Where did God/whatever come from?" If God existed then where did God come from? If the super basketball existed where did the matter come from?
Welcome to the endless argument for a species that is still too young and ignorant to answer the question. One sides uses faith while the other side uses evidence. The methods of one group can't be used to persuade the other. This argument will go nowhere until a significant break through or event changes the status quo of information.
Theists can't convert a strong Atheist and Atheists can't covert a strong theist, so stop trying.
I always saw it kind of like this, on the big bang matter question:
It's the leftovers from the last Universe that collapsed in it's own big crunch. I always saw that the universe was in a sort of loop, where it blows up, exists for a bit, collapses, and repeats.
Doesn't really explain anything, but it's fun to think about.
ShaggyJebus wrote...
Just throwing it out there, but on the religion side of where everything came from, God is the starting point, and the answer to the question, "What created God, who created everything else?" is - God did not have a creator. That is why He is God. The title "God" is given to the all-powerful being that could exist without a creator.
I believe Aristotle says that if we keep going back, asking who created what, we eventually have to ask, "Who created the first thing?" And the only answer to that question is, the creator-less creator, ie God. You don't have to necessarily say anything else about God, except that He created something, which could then create other things, but that He Himself was not created.
Faith is important here not only because this stuff cannot be proven scientifically but also because it doesn't make sense. It is impossible to exist without being created. Thus, only an all-powerful being, or a being with inconceivable power, could do such a thing, and that is what we call God. God is the being that does not have to play by the rules, even if God created the rules. That's why He is God.
On the other hand, it wouldn't make sense for God to exist in this universe and still be able to "not play by the rules". The ruleset of reality is cut and dried and not really alterable on the base level, though they can be bent.
The way I've always seen it, there are three possibilities:
God exists. However, in order to "not play by the rules:, he exists outside the human concepts of space and time. Kind of like having access to a game's source code. Thus, praying to him or venerating him would be pointless, because he would not hear it.
God existed, around the time when time began. He did his stuff, then either left or died, again leaving no point to prayer or worship.
God never existed. Self explanatory.
The reason I don't consider God capable of existing within our scope of universal awareness is that, in order to change it, he would have to have access to some form of energy to carry the changes out. It may be a type of energy humanity is unable to currently comprehend, much like electricity to cavemen, but that would not change the fact that it existed. As such, given that it exists, other should theoretically be able to then use it.
If you consider it that way, then not only does God lose the capital letter, it invites the idea that other gods may have existed or may exist elsewhere in the universe. Or, in other words, not so much gods as sentient beings advanced enough to have access to this universe-changing energy.
Going by that theory, this leads to two facts:
One, if these beings and energy exists somewhere out there, it's pretty far away, given that humanity hasn't seen reality distort itself randomly in out sector of space.
Two, if these then are simply advanced sentients and not god-beings, then there is STILL no point to prayer, worship, and sheep.