mnx wrote...
yeah,i'm thinking that given the power(ie. gun),civilians would likely to go out and bang.(that's the case with a lot of countries)
maybe that's not the case with the american.
i believe your words that americans wouldn't do it.
i get it.but i still couldn't stand the thought of lots of civilians carrying a potentially lethal weapon.
how about this:equip every civilians who need self protection it with taser or some kind of gun that isn't lethal(rubber bullet could kill).
and i heard that they're actually developing a pistol that can gauge its stopping force according to the distance between the shooter and the target.
so there won't be any blood spilled.no casualties.
them criminals might try to kill us,but it doesn't mean that we must kill to stop them.
sorry,i'm not even american and i talked too much.i just want the condition where casualties could be the lowest possible.
consider my posts is a foreigner's point of view.
Many people carry a taser or pepper spray but, usually women carry those and sometimes they just aren't effective. Tasers also run the risk of killing people who use a pacemaker or people with weak hearts.
Being an American and knowing the general way we all think. I believe restricting guns even more or outright banning them will only lead to higher crime rates like in England and Australia after their gun bans. Plus the American government has a history of overstepping its limits and wandering around like a giant with a short attention span.