Was Hitler a evil person?

Hitler may have his own agenda in killing the Jews but as we are informed by the media,he made it out of grudge.
There are a lot of things that need to be revealed to the public and to be explained in order to be a lesson for everyone.Otherwise,our mocking and critics would be useless.

Let us ask the question: Why did Hitler kill Jews in the first place?

There are MANY theories to that question, but know this; Jews did not offend him personally. There are theories that point out that maybe Hitler was affiliated with the wrong sort of Jews yes, but theories are theories. Until there is concrete evidence that the Holocaust was sparked by personal hatred, I will believe that his hatred of the Jews was inspired by the state of Germany itself back then. Jews had jobs while Germans suffered, and he grew up being taught that Germans were the superior race of people. How would you feel if 'vermin' stood higher than you?

He gave hope and a chance of revival to the German people. In the end, he was from the people, for the people and by the people that he instigated the Holocaust. He was misguided yes, but wasn't evil.

Exactly who is evil in this world is not something that people can judge really. Things can really change once you shift perspectives and in this case, he was a hero to the German people back then while he was probably the devil incarnate to the rest of the world.

What defines evil? How do you judge evil? You could look at something from so many different perspectives that judgement becomes clouded and only one side out of the two sides can achieve victory. That side is Justice. The losers are forever doomed to be branded evil. If both sides achieved victory there wouldn't be Justice or Evil at all. One side has to be sacrificed for the other to come out on top. Now, murdering people is indeed a crime and it is unforgivable, but then, why is the judge and the offender guilty of the same crime?

Hitler killed Jews. He was branded as a criminal. But then, what of the US dumping two Nukes on Japan? The Japanese were branded as evil and that Nukes were the only way to stop them. But still, the bombs killed civilians and destroyed cities. How is that not evil?

I find it amazing that the US talks about justice when its crimes are immeasurable.

Dude hitler was a evil person no questions asked. if you were mixed person you wouldve been shot the day you were born.

Yes Hitler is an evil person but he is an amazing leader. He has amazing people skills, for god sakes he was able to convince people to murder millions of innocent people! He's an amazing leader but a fucking scumbag.

What you wrote about Hitler is exactly what my German uncle said.

There are many stories and assumptions about Hitler , though his actions were hardcore. I think his country was in a very bad position and his people did suffer more and more countries started to take over Germany's grounds. ( Look at the map before WW2 and after ). So Hitler decided to take over the offensive and won back some grounds and maybe on the run he discovered his lust for power and fame and things got out of control.

However, I don't believe he is the first who wanted to take over the world, but he did want his German brethren and sisters to flourish in the lands they were born in.

Hitler had his own goals, he finds them righteous and just, where others find it evil and heartless, we can never know what his true intentions were.

*Extra*
Hitler loved science and spent most of his time with scientists to develop new weapons and technologies. He also had a thing for theories that involves space and traveling to new worlds.







Hitler was much more addicted to this sorta stuff than war, he believed it was something that had a much more greater meaning than the war itself.

Dritte Reich ( Third Reich )
That was something Hitler wanted, to create a civilization with him in power.

I just posted these videos just to write that he had passion for science and the outer world.

Yes, he was bad but the question is who was worst - Stalin or Hitler?
I'm amazed that Stalin still lives in hitler big shadow!

Yes, Hitler was evil. No doubt about it.

Hitler Was one EVIL MOTHERFUCKER. N

But say what you want, the entire World War II could have been avoided IF someone shoved a BOOT up the France and other winning parties ass. Versailles Peace Treaty in otherwords WE HAVE BIGGER DICKS THAN YOU treaty.

From my history lessons, the Versailles Peace Treaty was ment to stop Germany for starting another war. But they went wrong way to find the solution. USA offered a treaty where there was no winners or losers. That might have worked and kept Nazi party out of goverment. But they didnt like the idea and results of dumb decisions is shown in the history.

Now hitler rests in hell and is satans BITCH!

Here is proof:

But what if stalin goes beyond hitler?

Hitler killed every jew in germany but stalin killed everyone who had the power to remove him!

Know what you mean, But the topic was about Hitler. Stalin and USSR wasnt any better. Still murdering people who even looks wrong way.

There were some memories remained in the private diaries of teachers. There were writing about WWII. Quick Summary:

When the German came, they were polite. When they left the rooms clean.
When the Russians came, they werent polite. When they left the rooms were filthy, corner was used as toilet and books were destroyed and used as smoking paper.

Stalin lived (Still lives) in hitler shadow.
It's horrible, i'm mean you can go and ask any random kid on the street no matter age, "who hittler was" they'll answer "He killed the jews and started WW2"(in short) but if you ask them about Stalin, they'll say either "Who?" or "Yeah, that guy from Russia!".

There's few kid (8-15) that know who stalin was!
Stalin was a intelligent man (properly the smartest man lived at the time), the man who tricked the US, "won the WW2", transformed a huge nation into a super-power, send half his country to gulag (work camps) without reason and people still cries at his funeral!

Stalin even stay up late at night making up lists of people who were to be executed/ send to gulag and when he got tired he would write a brief note, "add 6000 more people... doesn't matter who".

There's even rumors about him killing more of his own men then hitler did altogether in ww2!

"Death solves all problems - no man, no problem."

"A single death is a tragedy, are million deaths is a statistic."
Joseph Stalin

This is a bit off-topic, but the topic is mediocre, so I don't care: The CIA did that already. Multiple times. That's why Iran hates us.

Starts back as far as 1953 with the TPAJAX Project and it continues today with the U.S supporting (and protecting) People's Mujahedin of Iran (PMOI)and the Jundullah militias. To this day the U.S CIA participates in black operations against Iran. This is accompanied by laws such as Iran Freedom and Support Act. Which gives money to any group that is opposed to the Iranian government.

Repped you back up for this balanced post. However, Hitler was definitely not for the people. He was selfish to the very end. At the end of the war, he just said the German people let him down and let the people deal with the Allies themselves. Also, Hitler did not make the German economy "bounce" back from the Great Depression. The way he got rid of unemployment was pretty much, in crude terms, "get people to join the army and get more people to produce war supplies and work on public projects". This kind of economic development is unsustainable. Eventually he would have ran out of funds. Also, during the Great Depression, both Germans and German Jews were part of the employed and unemployed. German Jews did not necessarily have more jobs than the Germans.



This, however, does not change the fact that Hitler's "crimes are immeasurable." The problem here is that, the current Western morality is telling us that killing for racial reasons are wrong.

I believe in these morals myself. So I'd think Hitler was evil and this kind of action can never be tolerated. And a moral relativist would say, "however, if the society thinks killing for racial reasons is right, then it would be right. It is all relative, about how you are brought up, so there are no 'true' or 'base' moral so it can be tolerated". (this is similar to the "see? victors are the ones with justice because they won, but if the losers won they would be justice, so you need to tolerate this kind of behaviour) But if you think about it, what if, say, a society called the LOLS were forcing people to their morals (eg, killing people for racial reasons is okay.) and a moral relativist would say to the LOLS that they cannot do that, because they have no right to force other people to their own morals. But then they can say, in our society, forcing other people to our own morals is okay! See? There is an inconsistency. If the moral relativist then say, everyone can have their own morals and you cannot force other people into it. Then they themselves are forcing this "moral" idea onto the LOLS people. So, since moral relativism is inconsistent with this universal tolerance... then there is not such thing called moral relativism. There must be some sort of basis here. And I'll take my Western morals. So how can Hitler be anything but evil in this case?

He was mean, but the evil people were the actual government officials behind the scenes. He was, if you imagine the nazi regime as those street performers with the dancing monkey, the dancing monkey. He was the face of the nazis but he had no real control, until he took over and attacked Britain and Russia soon after. This was his first mistake since he took over the needs of an entire empire by himself, and with this war tactic spread his troops too thin as a good chunk went to Russia while most of his air-force bombed Britain. Then, you basically know what happened from there. The hating of Jews was his idea, and after he wrote Mein Kampf and stressed the Aryans was when he really gained attention.

I'm pretty sure his tactic was working because he almost won. Hitler was the one controlling Germany and the regime. He gained power through his words and how incompetent the previous leaders were because of how they allowed Germany to suffer because of WWI.
watch http://www.biography.com/people/adolf-hitler-9340144?page=1

Hitler was an evil person, yes. But he was quite possibly the most charismatic leader in a long time. Such charismatic people are far-and-few between.

Going by the most basic definitons of evil, yes he was. He caused the suffering of millions of innocents AND started the second world war.

He is evil, but he was a great leader. However, his morals are a bit...questionable.