What's with the double standard?!
0
Flaser wrote...
Mr.Shaggnificent wrote...
If a key opens many locks, it is a master. if a lock can be opened by many keys, it's a shitty lock.seriously though, i supose it's because women hold most all the sexual power, and men are jealous of that.
Let me quote myself, since I've already expressed my views on this bullshit:
Flaser wrote...
SamRavster wrote...
[font=verdana][color=green][i]"A key that opens many locks is a great key. A lock that opens to many keys is just a shitty lock". Except a pussy is not a lock, and you dong is not a key, just a fucked up sausage that was left out in the sun too long.
Frankly that "Aesop" is getting waaaay too old.
We're not living in the Middle Ages and girls aren't trophies to be "won" or "sold" in exchange for an alliance.
...and no, dominance and the enjoyment of dominance games in relationships/sex doesn't validate it either in any way. Just because someone can enjoy being submissive doesn't mean that it's OK to treat them that way by default. I also wonder how many "M" girls would be OK with their fetish if it was forced on them, instead a kink they can live out with their chosen partner.
A pussy is a sex organ. So is a dick. Playing with them brings pleasure. That's it.
Play nice! Play Safe! (...give head and for God's sake, if you fuck someone up the least you can do is give a reach around).
...or Uncle Flaser and his Bitch Brigade will bring the wrath of Feminist Pimps down on ya ass!
;w; Someone after my own heart!
0
It doesn't matter whether it's a woman screwing many men, or men screwing many women. The only difference is that a man can impregnate many women, whereas(baring twins) a woman can only carry one fetus at a time. While the sexual reproduction of a woman might be slower, she has the same effect via the child's growth and that child's expected development.
This is why we're expected to have a major decline: We have MORE men than women, your sexual theory is a fallacy. Since if it were true, it wouldn't matter if we had less women. Our society will thrive when there's a healthy balance of men and women and equally with sexual respect.
Women have more staying power, and men have actually declined in their sexual roles as they've forsaken their romantic responsibilities. IE: Sure, the man can dial a woman up for pregnancy but because he was a dickhead, deadbeat loser the child also faced developmental challenges that kept him from his/her fullest potential.
It is with the Truism of Darwinism/Evolution that I dismiss the above mentioned theory, and I state that the theory's engaging practice in the 21st century is the first hurdle socially that Humanity must overcome to sustain it's existence. A Woman is that which bestows life upon the planet, a man is the one who nurtures and then must take care of the seed. If he fails in his responsibility as the guardian of his woman and his child, he has accomplished no effects for the future generation or for Humanity's survival. He's failed his family and his kind.
This is why we're expected to have a major decline: We have MORE men than women, your sexual theory is a fallacy. Since if it were true, it wouldn't matter if we had less women. Our society will thrive when there's a healthy balance of men and women and equally with sexual respect.
Women have more staying power, and men have actually declined in their sexual roles as they've forsaken their romantic responsibilities. IE: Sure, the man can dial a woman up for pregnancy but because he was a dickhead, deadbeat loser the child also faced developmental challenges that kept him from his/her fullest potential.
It is with the Truism of Darwinism/Evolution that I dismiss the above mentioned theory, and I state that the theory's engaging practice in the 21st century is the first hurdle socially that Humanity must overcome to sustain it's existence. A Woman is that which bestows life upon the planet, a man is the one who nurtures and then must take care of the seed. If he fails in his responsibility as the guardian of his woman and his child, he has accomplished no effects for the future generation or for Humanity's survival. He's failed his family and his kind.