Psyboi wrote...
OK. Atheism is the belief that there is no God. You say atheism is the absence of faith but seeing as you are defending your belief doesn't that mean you have faith in your belief. Oh and God is not "something" and I'm not doing the "same thing". As I have pointed out man cannot prove God's existence.
Let's not change the subject to Santa Clause, leprechauns etc. Do not even use those kind of analogies to God. We are talking about God, (BTW muslim God and Christian God is the same just with diff. name) someone that has the bible to support His existence. The Bible was written under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit by over 40 different authors from all walks of life: shepherds, farmers, tent-makers, physicians, fishermen, priests, philosophers and kings. Despite these differences in occupation,time line, and the span of years it took to write it, the Bible is an extremely cohesive and unified book.
Every effect must have a cause. This universe and everything in it is an effect. There must be something that caused everything to come into existence. Ultimately, there must be something “un-caused” in order to cause everything else to come into existence. That “un-caused” cause is God.
I would have thought that the absence of God's moral code in this world is probably one of the most observable phenomena going. Science is the study of observed phenomena. Since no-one has ever observed the process of evolution at work and cannot even prove that this process is an ongoing endeavor, are you not teaching your opinion (which BTW needs faith).
How would you explain the beginning of the universe? Big Bang? I can name flaws in the big bang scenario.
Every culture throughout history has had some form of law. Everyone has a sense of right and wrong. Murder, lying, stealing, and immorality are almost universally rejected. Where did this sense of right and wrong come, where does your sense of right and wrong come from if not from a holy God?
People claim to reject God’s existence because it is “not scientific” or “because there is no proof.” The true reason is that once they admit that there is a God, they also must realize that they are responsible to God and in need of forgiveness from Him (Romans 3:23, 6:23). If God exists, then we are accountable to Him for our actions. If God does not exist, then we can do whatever we want without having to worry about God judging us. That is why many of those who deny the existence of God cling strongly to the theory of naturalistic evolution—it gives them an alternative to believing in a Creator God. God exists and ultimately everyone knows that He exists. The very fact that some attempt so aggressively to disprove His existence is in fact an argument for His existence.
Atheist share only one common bond, we only care for what we can prove, and we want the correct answer. I don't take my stance on religion because it's more convent, i have had to lie to my parents and adults for nearly four years now. But i take it because i view it as the right option, If god where to come down and show himself i would believe in him in an intent. Atheism is just the lack of believe, we take nothing as a reality that we can prove without faith.
And no, the bible is extremely contradictory from book to book, have you ever actually gone through the entire thing? It's something ever christian should do.
The fact that every action has a cause is a observable truth, however observable truths have a tendency to reach a limit. If i have an object travailing at the speed of light, and i push it forward it will go no faster; since the speed of light is the fastest something can travel, even though everything i have ever pushed foreword has gone faster.
"This "Un-Caused" is god." Do you have any evidence for this? Imagine if the men before you used a similar ideaoligy; of we don't know so let's assume this. The most honest answer anyone can give themselves is i don't know; And to be honest i don't know what the cause of the universe is, the big bang theory is a solid hpothosis, but even the people who created this theory would change it if they found new evidence that contradicted their ideal's.
Evolution can be studied in the off spring of rapid reproducing animals, we can see the subtle changes from generation to generation. While we can also view the changes in fossils.
As for morals, first off most Christians don't follow the morals set out in the bible; I.E. stoning non virgin brides or not working on the Sabbath. So how can the bible provide moral direction if you must nit pick from it. (also, your on a porn site so really don't say the entire bible is through and through moral without first saying you yourself are going to hell.)
Morality is simply doing things that are right or wrong, and these things are defined by how our actions affect society; and we obey these moral laws because were under the eye of our peers. Would you be on this sight if your mom was in the room?
Atheist do not reject god because we believe in him and wish to sin, we don't believe in god because there's not enough evidence to the claim.
As a final note, i have no interest in debating with someone who's unwilling to accept the others opinion in the case of overwhelming evidence. That's the main differences between hard core Christians and atheist, atheist view and consider things and reevaluate the ideas they hold, Christians shrug it off and say god works in mysterious ways.
As a final side note, i don't hate faith in any way, your as free to believe anything you want for whatever reason, i only care if you are trying to prove your point, or pass laws/other things that affect me.
I have little interest in starting a flame war. If you can't agree to even change your viewpoint in wake of overwhelming evidence i have nothing to say to you, and don't expect a reply, and so should you superstring.