NosferatuGuts wrote...
Basically, I think you over state the amount of wasted money on this research. Neither of us really knows anything really specific about this research. And even if its not super efficient, look at how much money America spends on defence. Money spend of defence increases killing eficienty by a lot so if you spend that money on research of cancer you would save lots of lives (even if its not highly efficient).
Perhaps. It seems a tad outlandish to use that method, however.
nacho wrote...
Ironically, the first post gave me cancer. Shouldn't it be common knowledge that cures exist by now? Read some god [censored] books instead of trying to play scientist on a hentai forum.
Listen, ignorant swine. I don't know whether or not you're just a dumb Toif
* or you simply didn't read my first post. I've already shown why a cure CANNOT be made for cancer. Unless you would like to COUNTER my point (and countering does not include saying "luk @ buks u id10t." I'm very well read, thanks, and I've come across nothing that is neither able to prove a cure DOES exist, nor able to prove how a cure COULD exist due to the nature of what cancer is.
*toif: (pejorative) Californian
avorix wrote...
But the question is can Cancer be cured by humans eventually or is it a false reality regulated inside a dream ?
The latter. Hence my ire at us spending money on "researching" it.
gizgal wrote...
I realize that. Not saying it applies only to "cures" but also to medication to ease pain and symptoms in general.
Well why didn't you just say so? I wasn't complaining about researching cancer treatment. I was complaining about researching a "cure" for cancer, which doesn't (and won't ever) exist.
theotherjacob wrote...
PROTIP: Perfection is a matter of perspective. An imperfect being can be perfect in the eyes of any other who wishes to see them as such. Cancer is rightly as you state, a dysfunction of some cells within the body due to damage while replicating. It is in the genetic code of the cell, but guess what, genetics is not absolute. Genetics is not something that stays the same all the time.
Genetics can vary greatly amoung people from birth to death. Genetics can be modified by living in different location, diets, drugs, etc.
Least to mention that humans have already mapped our own human dna sequences and that of many other animals. We've successfully created hyrbid animals that aren't related in labs and can easily work our magic on ourselfs, infact we already have.
BUT WAIT, there's more...
Gene therapy as it is so called, messing with the genetic code to change the outcome of organic cells already happens in nature. Isn't that incredible, mother nature herself already invented it billions of years ago. We just happen to call them viruses. How does a virus work it's magic in the human body? Well it starts by attaching itself to a single or set of cells. It injects it's genetic makeup into the cell and attaches it to the replication dna of those cells, which allow the virus to spread around the body. It's this groovy thing that we like to call mutation.
All viruses bind to their hosts and introduce their genetic material into the host cell as part of their replication cycle. Therefore this has been recognized as a plausible strategy for gene therapy, by removing the viral DNA and using the virus as a vehicle to deliver the therapeutic DNA.
A number of viruses have been used for human gene therapy, including retrovirus, adenovirus, lentivirus, herpes simplex virus, vaccinia, pox virus, and adeno-associated virus.
I'm assuming you've heard of evolution, cause if you have, then we're already on the same page here. Genetics is not solid, and it can change, and definately can be forced to change.
That very logic is the same logic I've BEEN using. No matter how many times we create a supplement to get the body to able to recognise a specific mutation in a cell (or, more precisely, one that leads to the development of a malignant tumour), there will be more than a centillion new mutations to do the same for. It's unrealistic and (literally) inhuman to be able to account for every single mutation that could occur in a cell.