What's with this tier business?
0
KawaiianPunch wrote...
Quadratic wrote...
My brother... LOVES FALCO AND MARTH.Ugh, it pisses me off when he uses Marth and stands there with his counter thing going the entire battle.
Tiers are stupid.
Tiers dont have anything to do with your inability to punish the other guy for spamming the same thing.. just saying.
Okay, counter and guard.
Close range = him countering me
mid-range = guard
long range = guard
It sucks ;_;
0
Unsigned wrote...
I was playing Smash Bros. with some friends and we did a random battle. My friend got Ganondorf and he came in last place. He then said, "That doesn't count because Ganondorf is bottom tier." I was like "what the crap are you talking about" and he went super nerd on me to explain this tier business. Sounds like another excuse for sucking. Except Carl from Blazblue, he's just hard to use but that's no reason to discount a win.
I don't know exactly what games you were playing (FFA or 1v1), but he really shouldn't have said anything. Though in your friend's defense, Gannondorf does really suck. Really, really suck.
As for tiers, well, tiers vary by game. In some games, the bottom tier characters are tourny-viable (rather than saying they play well against the top tier). And in other games, using bottom tier is like committing suicide.
Kotone wrote...
As everyone else is saying, Tiers are pretty important, but where the character actually places isn't what's important. It's the MATCH UPS that character has against other certain characters.Also, a character's options (though I suppose this can fall under match-ups). The more options a character has for any situation, the better they are.
Quadratic wrote...
My brother... LOVES FALCO AND MARTH.Ugh, it pisses me off when he uses Marth and stands there with his counter thing going the entire battle.
Tiers are stupid.
Don't blame tiers just because you can't bait the Counter then throw his ass off the stage.
