mibuchiha wrote...
Found this somewhere as I lurk the net... Gotta admit, I lol'd. I never knew such an outline exists, and imo it shouldn't. People write what they want the way they want. Let the inspiration bring you wherever. XD
Supposedly the best way to create an awesome fic wrote...
If the author creates compelling characters and natural dialog, he or she is 90% of the way to success. My feeling is that the way in which a writer writes is actually more important than the plot. Stephen King, who writes so well, could write a novel about a peanut butter sandwich and it would be great.
1. First, browse to Cliff Pickover's Tips for Writers
2. Second, browse to the New York Times recipe for creating an instant bestseller.
3. Third, browse to the Lester Dent magical recipe for creating a best seller.
4. My additional advice:
1. Buy a National Geographic magazine. Page through it and select a setting. Look at the photos to help you create vivid descriptions.
2. Your novel should have two main characters C1 and C2 (a man and a woman) and two secondary characters C3 and C4 (also a man and a woman). C1 should fall in love with C2 during the course of the book, or, if already in love, their love should deepen. A subliminal attraction should also exist between C1 and C4 to increase tension. Character C1 should have a special skill that will help him (or her) solve problems presented in the book.
3. At some point in the book, C1 and C2 should show a physical expression of their attraction, such as exhibited by holding hands or kissing.
4. A dangerous condition should exist throughout much of the book.
5. The dangerous condition should appear to be mitigated at some point in the book but come back to haunt the characters.
6. Avoid any long descriptions that slow down the pace. Practice keeping the pace of your novel brisk by allowing no paragraph to be more than five sentences. (You can relax this prohibition later in a few places if you find it absolutely necessary.)
7. Start your book with something that grabs the reader's attention. Make your first sentence shine.
8. Don't use flashbacks. They break the flow of the book.
9. Never submit a work without having several people proofread it first.
The first three are fine. Reading tips never hurts. The person's personal notes force me to label them an idiot, however, as I could tell you half of them don't work and I've only been published once (albeit in a school literary zine).
1. National Geographic is a nature publication. Rare is it that a novel will take place completely in a place so devoid of civilization. If anything research architecture for the area and time-period you wish to use.
2. Love triangles aren't always good, and mostly are done badly. A love triangle's success is heavily dependent on the genre. The protagonist (C1) also doesn't need a special skill and I would in fact advise against it. One talent should not and would not be applicable to the array of problems a book SHOULD have.
3. No problems here. In fact if the author used a love triangle then of course physical manifestations of their emotional connection should come out.
4. Again this is heavily genre based. A pure romance shouldn't have a dangerous condition and action should. KnH for example would be stupid to have an overarching threat of death for all the characters. One character in a romance having a deadly illness works, but not all characters must be threatened by it (though the sick student cliche is rather contrived).
5. No problems here, either. False sanctuary is a component that will often naturally occur even if the author weren't following these tips.
6. Heavy description coincides with a person or object worth taking such effort to describe. A good writer can keep a satisfying pace while still being descriptive.
7. NO FRIGGIN DUH
8. Flashbacks are actually the best way to provide characterization without advancing the plot. Stephen King (who is lauded by the creator of this list) personally recommends it in his own book on the subject of writing.
9. Again, this should be obvious. A writer shouldn't read their own work profusely, as each red-through heightens the chance of them scrapping the work. Every long-term piece needs proof-readers.