Sound of Destiny wrote...
While I understand where you're coming from, I still don't quite agree. There are so many little things that a person can use to infer about a scene or a character. What a character says and how he says it, the location and atmosphere, what he does and what others do to him, etc. These can all be used to imply a greater meaning without having any attention brought to them. My favourite moments when reading are when I'm able to piece together something, such as an insight into the inner workings of a character or a deeper thematic element of the story, on my own. It's seriously cathartic to know that I was able to take all the little elements and relate them to one another in a way that makes sense. If I'm told things straight then I don't need to think as hard or look at the big picture because it's already being done for me. If I outright stated why Rowan was so fed up with his father or why he left, then I would take that feeling away from my readers, which I don't want to do. I left the hints there and whether or not the readers are able to come to the conclusion that is in line with what I intended, I'm happy. As long as I got them to think about it, that is.
I didn't react to your entry the way you intended because I can't read the writer's mind. This catharsis can only be felt by the writer I feel unless you and I were to read the entry together with you dropping a few hints here and there and asking me to read your entry again.
I never really understood why things aren't spelt out in modern literature. If I were to understand what is going on, if I were to sympathise with our hero wouldn't it make sense to at least explain what is his predicament at the beginning? This approach of not doing that is really like throwing me the jigsaw pieces without showing me the picture I am supposed to piece together.
To be fair, this isn't that much of a problem for your entry because you flat out explained what had happened albeit through dialogue. The refusal to spell things out or at least give an idea what is going on is really a problem not for this entry but for a couple of other entries submitted for this contest.
So when you say that you'd just be guessing, that's actually what I want you to do. Now of course, this won't be for everyone. I know for a fact (well, based off what you've said in the past at least) that you dislike it when things are open for interpretation and that's fine. Different people like different things. I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree on this matter.
I don't think it is a matter of taste. If the reader is left guessing what is going on even after he read the story wouldn't you agree that the writer didn't do his job properly? I am not talking about stories that have open or unresolved endings. I am talking about entries like Dawn of Dark's (to exaggerate a little) where the narrative is completely incomprehensible.
Once again, to be fair, I don't think the entry is hard to understand on the whole. Once it was clear that the protagonist's father left a girl under no one's care, the entire story is easy to follow. I just didn't like the lines of dialogue at the opening which don't seem to serve a purpose, especially when a line of exposition would suffice.
Well, it's only stated that you have to follow one of the themes, not both, and when you look at all the different entries, most only followed one of the two themes.
Well, bonus points to those who came up with the entry that adhered to both of the themes which is why I thought Yanker's entry ought to win. The purpose of me setting criteria is to shortlist the entries that ought to win. This is useful especially when many of the entries are well written.
I just feel like as a judge, it's your duty to those entering to be as balanced in your viewpoint as possible.
As a judge I must be able to look past all the things that I instinctively like and dislike to find the one that achieves what it set out to do in the most effective and compelling way possible. I hope you can understand where I'm coming from.
I disagree in the context of this contest. I see myself as someone who is grading essays based on requirements that I and the judges stipulated. They so happen to reflect my tastes in writing. Some of the entries adhered to the requirements better than yours so I, with the other judges have to deem those better entries.
I don't think it is possible to discard bias when it comes to judging something as subjective as writing or other art forms, especially when I am more inclined towards entries that are more straightforward and clear.
It doesn't make sense for me to judge an entry I can't understand or fail to appreciate as a better entry compared to one that I can easily understand.
It really helps when a story is almost entirely composed of dialogue. Having those conversations end in a way that felt organic did force me to extend some things more than I'd have liked though. Either way, since I tried to cut out anything I felt was unneeded, I was able to get through a lot more with a lot less.
Some of the dialogue especially those towards the end, I can understand. That is only possible if the setting of the story is established. I just can't see how Rowan's (and indeed Lily's) predicament can be explained with to and fro dialogue. It is possible with a long monologue but that might be awkward.
However, I felt that the parts where Heather and Rowan were arguing can be trimmed down. During my first read of your entry, I almost skipped that part entirely.
Also, sorry if I seemed aggressive or whatever in the first post. That wasn't my intention. Even if we disagree on certain things, I appreciate you taking the time to criticise my story and reply to these walls of text.
Don't worry about it. I enjoy arguing which is why I took the time to write down all of these. Glad to have an opportunity to speak with a user especially after this site has gone commercial.