darkblack wrote...
You're talking about money, which is new and humanly constructed. Art has existed waaaay before monetary systems started. For the most part, what drives artists to create are their own instinctive drive.
Money is not new, money (or it's equivalent) is almost as old as art itself. Money is simply a way to replace the barter system which civilization quickly out grew. It has existed since the beginning of civilization. Man-made, yes - but so what - art is man-made - we don't need either to survive, simply to enrich our existence.
darkblack wrote...
For most of the writers, painters, musicians, and scientists I've read, they create for the sake of creating. Rarely do people artists create as a means to achieve the end of money. For now, artists rely on money to be able to buy food. They can't create if they die.
A very simplistic view. At some level there is a great deal of truth in the statement, but it certainly is not that simple. First, in most cases where this is true, we are talking about individual artists who do NOT derive their living through their creations. Those who wish to make even a meager living from their craft quickly learn that the realities of every day life quickly close in on them. A friend (a oil painter) refuses to sell out (as she puts it) and has to work to pay her basic bills - in fact she often resorts to welfare to survive. Another friend is a successful water colorist, who has found a comfortable balance between painting what sells and what soothes his soul. Both sell btw, it is just thta the water colorist sells much more.
Second, in most cases we are also talking about artist who work in affordable mediums. Want to sculpt in marble, you better be selling a lot of sculptures or have a patron - either way money is definitely involved.
Third, in none of these cases we are discussing includes art that requires collaborative efforts to produce and a very expensive medium to work in. I used to work next door to Pixar, you don't want to know what their computer and server farm alone costs. Anime is not the creation of an individual (even original anime - as opposed to works derived from manga, which adds another layer). It requires a large group of people in almost all cases, and expensive equipment to produce. If we're talking about cases where the artists creates for creations sake alone, there would be no anime, no animated feature films at all, because individuals simply can not produce them.
Which returns us to our original point, anime will never be produced by individuals for arts sake alone, it's simply not practical. So how exactly does your revolution hold up in the cold hard light of reality?