vaLentine wrote...
New animes have better art or better animation than old animes, but still some new anime are just so whatever. What matter most for me is their content or story or so. So I didn't vote.
Bullshit.
animehot2 wrote...
New animes surpass old when it comes to drawing, plot, voice and graphics
But we can never forget the classics that started it all
Bullshit.
You people never watched stuff from the OVA boom. Hmm... how to qualify what I'm speaking about:
1960-1970': Early anime, creation of classical genres
1980-1990': OVA BOOM, masssive experimentation, ridiculously high budgets, anime branches out into more adult themes. Debut of a new generation of directors and artists. Sci-fi is the flagship theme and anime frequently have cool settings made for the show. Also (body-)horror and over the top violence.
1990-2000': Age of Televise anime with frequent product tie-ins. Widespread Commercialization, end of high budgets, Codification of several genres. Era of deconstructions, often darker and edgier. Earlier new generation is making a variety of shows. More TV shows, so violence (compared to the boom) was toned down. Still quite a lot of good shows.
2010-today: Age of Otaku and DVD sales. Milking genres and pandering to earlier tropes... genuine invention is harder to encounter, usually relegated to big budget projects with veterans in the seat. Possible crash of industry due the over-reliance on shows pandering to fandom instead innovation. In one word: All that MOESHIT. Good shows are still made, however they're less frequent than before due overt codification and executive meddling.
PS.: No, I can enjoy good find slice of life animes as well as one focusing on "cute" things... however when this is done to the detriment of everything else (story, characterisation, innovation) then I find it highly annoying.