cruz737 wrote...
You never made a case for AI other than "people are stupid". In that case bravo, what a well thought out irrefutable sentiment. Might as well have used the argument, "COME ON, IT'S 20XX".
>No logic given to back up the relation
>Making an excuse to avoid dialogue
People being limited in capability compared to AI is an argument, don't try to downplay it just because it's not easy to refute. I'd love to go off about transhumanism and our new AI overlords in a more fitting place, what say I create a thread and you show me just how right you think you are? Or we can do it here, I'm good with both.
But I bet you're too much of a pussy to accept the challenge and will try to weasel out of it like you always do.
cruz737 wrote...
And you yes you do, if you're unwilling to see how more spending and more printing and lending (which you advocated and question why there was any interest rates at all). Don't go spouting things now that you didn't say before without admitting it.
Admitting what? I still advocate more spending, and nothing I've said so far goes against that. I never advocated lending, and I never questioned
why there was interest, I pointed out that there doesn't
need to be any interest.
cruz737 wrote...
those stuck with the bill should suck it up
Misquoting me to imply I said something less than I did.
Nice.
cruz737 wrote...
You're an idiot and at odds with yourself.
Now tell me about how you're so smart you post reports created by known frauds and don't check any of your sources.