2016 is looking grim
0
Cruz
Dope Stone Lion
William wrote...
cruz737 wrote...
You never made a case for AI other than "people are stupid". In that case bravo, what a well thought out irrefutable sentiment. Might as well have used the argument, "COME ON, IT'S 20XX".>No logic given to back up the relation
>Making an excuse to avoid dialogue
People being limited in capability compared to AI is an argument, don't try to downplay it just because it's not easy to refute. I'd love to go off about transhumanism and our new AI overlords in a more fitting place, what say I create a thread and you show me just how right you think you are? Or we can do it here, I'm good with both.
But I bet you're too much of a pussy to accept the challenge and will try to weasel out of it like you always do.
cruz737 wrote...
And you yes you do, if you're unwilling to see how more spending and more printing and lending (which you advocated and question why there was any interest rates at all). Don't go spouting things now that you didn't say before without admitting it.Admitting what? I still advocate more spending, and nothing I've said so far goes against that. I never advocated lending, and I never questioned why there was interest, I pointed out that there doesn't need to be any interest.
cruz737 wrote...
those stuck with the bill should suck it upMisquoting me to imply I said something less than I did.
Nice.
cruz737 wrote...
You're an idiot and at odds with yourself.Now tell me about how you're so smart you post reports created by known frauds and don't check any of your sources.
>I can make an argument but it's gonna be somewhere else at another time
>Don't you run away coward
Okay. Make you thread.
>it's hard to make a rebuttal to AI controlled society
>implying there isn't thousands of rebuttals to altruism
Ha. You're silly but yeah, make your thread or whatever.
>you misquoted me
No I didn't. You clearly said it was the government's money to create and give at any interest rates they want (clearly missing the point of how the value of the dollar works...)and those stuck with the bill aren't the one's making the decisions so tough luck
>Frauds
I don't care. You can attack the character of the site all you want but it's not a rebuttal to their point or mine.
For someone who likes claiming confirmation bias you sure are bad at proving it. Unless you believe ad hominems are acceptable. If that case, okay you "win"?
0
CronaBaka wrote...
Mommy, Cruz and Will are boring me to death~!What's it like being ignorant?
cruz737 wrote...
No I didn't. You clearly said it was the government's money to create and give at any interest rates they want (clearly missing the point of how the value of the dollar works...)and those stuck with the bill aren't the one's making the decisions so tough luck
Provide a direct quote.
cruz737 wrote...
Create the threadAlright.
cruz737 wrote...
I don't care. You can attack the character of the site all you want but it's not a rebuttal to their point or mine.So you get your information from known frauds? Okay then.
0
Cruz
Dope Stone Lion
William wrote...
CronaBaka wrote...
Mommy, Cruz and Will are boring me to death~!What's it like being ignorant?
cruz737 wrote...
No I didn't. You clearly said it was the government's money to create and give at any interest rates they want (clearly missing the point of how the value of the dollar works...)and those stuck with the bill aren't the one's making the decisions so tough luck
Provide a direct quote.
cruz737 wrote...
Create the threadAlright.
cruz737 wrote...
I don't care. You can attack the character of the site all you want but it's not a rebuttal to their point or mine.So you get your information from known frauds? Okay then.
Prove them wrong using something other than ad hominems. Also fuck. Do you know how long it's going to take to go through discord, because I'd rather not. I know it's my fault for not getting screenshots but I genuinely never thought we'd be talking about this again.
