Rayne wrote...
[font=Georgia]
Adder - I seriously don't know where you're getting this whole 'you're following what everyone else is' mindset. You know, the whole 'mindless television' one. As TMS said, more and more Americans are pro-life these days.
If america was pro-life, then abortion would be legal in only very rare cases. Considering the fact that around one in every five (some studies say four) pregnancies ends in surgical abortion, and about 48% of abortions are repeat abortions means that more than likely we are keeping it legal just so that people can have a good time and then screw the consequences.
Also- What TMS and you are saying isn't necessarily true. I run into three types of people when it comes to the abortion issue.
First type: Staunchly in favor.
These people are the type who will get in your face, and pretty much tell you off if you disagree with them. They claim to be open-minded and liberal, but in the end they are generally more close-minded than conservatives and just wind up looking:
A. Like someone who doesn't value a human life.
B. Somewhat uninformed
C. Stubborn
Second Type: "Pro-life" [Wishy-washy]
The type of person who "Is against abortion, But....I wont tell anyone else what to do." If a robber was pointing a gun to the head of a victim, you wouldn't tell them what to do either?! People like this generally appear to be:
A. Weak-willed
B. Confused
C. Uncaring
Third Type: Staunch Pro-lifer
The type of conservative crazies that stand outside abortion clinics with signs saying "All abortionists are going to hell." These people generally use religion to argue on a non-religious argument. It IS a moral argument, and a religion can help determine one's morals, however...They should speak in a much larger vocabulary than "The Bible says.." These people generally appear to be:
A. Uneducated
B. Overly condemning
C. Strong-willed
As you can see this is a lose/lose/lose situation. If someone falls into any of these categories I consider their views to be based off of that of the general population, and not individual. Sure, you can be individual and agree with the majority, but generally speaking, great thinkers do not conform.
I try my hardest not to fall into these three extremes. I am not for abortion, and so I am not included in group one. I stand strong against abortion, and so I am not in group number two. Finally, I am not some nut-case who wants to condemn every single abortionist/ person who has had an abortion.. I consider this to be more condemnable than the abortion itself.
Rather- I wish to engage in conversation with pro-choicers, and see if they bring up any valid points whatsoever while still arguing from a moral standpoint. So far, this has only been the case in one argument- When a mother is made deathly sick by her baby. After hearing Rayne's story of his acquaintance whom committed suicide because of a rape, I am mulling the fact that an abortion should be excusable if the mother is suffering SEVERE (not anything less- As I said earlier..Women are very strong.) mental trauma that could result in death. Again, the point is about saving life- not losing it.
Regardless of what statistics say, almost every single person I've ever talked to on the matter (even many pro-lifers) think that abortion should be legal in some cases. I am open to some extent on this point. As I stated earlier- If the baby living would cause the mother to die, then in that case I believe an abortion is excusable.
Also, most of the people america considers to be "Pro-life" are right wing conservatives. Some of these people are the same people that are for the death penalty. That label does not apply to me..In fact, the only point I really agree with conservatives on IS the abortion issue. That, however, is an argument for a different thread. A life is a life- End of story.
Again- The argument you all have been using, the case of rape, is less than ONE PERCENT of all abortions performed in the united states. Even if we could just compromise our views and leave abortions open in case of deadly sickness or rape that would cut out ~95% of abortions.
The thread is not titled "Is abortion in the case of a rape right or wrong". I have met people who think all abortions should remain legal just for the rare case of an abortion from rape. They disagree with more than 90% of abortions, and somehow still support them. Last I checked, in mathematics when we had .9...We didn't round down- We rounded up.
I do not wish to keep reviving this thread every time someone quotes me selectively, or misquotes me.
So, as my last post here I will sum up my opinion one FINAL time. - Wrong.
I hope to get along with you guys on the rest of the site- I also look forward to engaging in debate/dialect on other topics, and and who knows...Someday I could change my mind, or you could change yours... Hope to see you both around. So long!