shin1000 wrote...
Anyway back to topic, I would probably just shoot his leg or arm than end a person's life if needed because ending a person's life should not be decided by other people but should be decided by yourself.
If you injured him enough to subdue him but not kill him, then put a bullet in his head to finish him off.
You'll probably end up being jailed for murder instead of self-defence.
There's a good chance you'll miss their arm/leg you're better off going for their chest in that sort of situation, have you considered they might also have a gun?
Edit: There's a rather large artery running through both legs pierce it with a bullet and they'll bleed out real quick.
Edit 2: Shooting someone in the arms or legs still constitutes use of force so you'll still have to explain yourself to the legal system when the dust settles.
Edit 3:
Myths of self-defence read, it's doesn't constitute legal advice but it sure as hell debunks some of the myths people believe when it comes to having to shoot people in a self-defence situation.