Classy wrote...
"seemingly contradicting" lol it is a contradiction it isn't seemingly.
It depends on your perception of "biased". To be biased means you are *favoring one person or side over another;". I meant this definition when I said subjecting yourself to bias was what it meant to be judged.
Hind sight, probably not the best term to use despite only using it as a little joke. When I say the judges are "unbiased" I mean it in the colloquial sense "tendency [that] interferes with the ability to be impartial, unprejudiced, or objective.. In other words, bias is generally seen as a 'one-sided' perspective". This isn't the original definition of bias, but it is what "bias" is perceived as by most people - something that interferes with impartial judging or decision making.
In this sense, the judges are not at all bias.
Classy wrote...
I just figured you would give everyone who actually wrote something a chance at least with the Popular Vote not the 3 judges vote.
Ah, I see. Well I feel I did Classy. I let in a wide array of different types of writing and in particular writings that are not considered you average contest entry variety. That said, if the writing did not have merit beyond trying to incite people's ire, or mocked the spirit of the contest, I didn't allow it. If the author of that piece was boarder line on their entry, I PM'd them. If anyone PM'd me or posted asking why their entry wasn't allowed, I listened and explained why not and even allowed their entry if warranted.
Nobody who blatantly broke the rules (unfortunately some people either just missed the deadline or forgot to submit a link to their entry) ever complained to me or asked for an explanation or exception.
Not one.
I hope that answers your question and the questions of anyone else thinking the same thing.