Jericho Antares wrote...
I wouldn't have liked it if instead Ser Royce, Gared, and Will are all out ranging looking for wildlings and when Will gets scared he's like "Hey guys, let's get back to the Wall, where we, the Night's Watch are stationed and serve as guardians of the Wall from what is north of it.". Even if you worked something in with the narrative, it would reek of an info dump, no matter how small.
There are ways to put in exposition without the interrupting the flow or pace or how the story reads. I think the Lord of the Rings did that very well. Although it did occur to me that you might dislike the LOTR prologue and the "Shadow of the Past".
Put this book next to "Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring". The Shire is explained and all the set-pieces of their journey are explained to Frodo and the other hobbits because none have ever left the Shire and the whole world is new to them. It gives an excuse to include info dumps.
The Lord of the Rings prologue is a huge info-dump that resembles an encyclopedia entry or a textbook chapter. I liked it very much and consider it a proper prologue. The first chapter "A Long Expected Party" made sense all the more thanks to it. The next info-dump is "The Shadow of The Past" where Gandalf tells Frodo the history of the Ring. Gandalf did an effective monologue with little to no interruption from Frodo.
As for how the prologue could have been better, for me, it is quite simple. Go into third person exposition for the prologue instead of using it to describe the scenery (I know you made it clear that you hated that style of writing),
"The continent enjoyed an uneasy peace after Robert the Kingslayer usurped the throne from the mad King... The story begins at the northernmost frontiers of the continent at the Wall which kept the Seven Kingdoms safe from The Wildlings..."
To quote SparksNotes:
"Three men of the Night’s Watch, Waymar, Will, and Gared, were in search for a small group of wildlings, uncivilized people who live north of the giant wall that protects the Seven Kingdoms."
It would definitely be a better read or make more sense than what I was presented. I think it is a matter of taste. You would find my suggestions jarring but I would find them very interesting because it is giving me information about an alien world.
I can use context clues, and if my suspension of disbelief is in full swing, I'll keep going. I should want to read more and find out by reading. However, if the writing style isn't to a particular reader's liking, then it all goes up in flames anyway, don't it?
Finding hints in the story, which are most likely embedded in some dialogue where each line is a fragmented sentence and you almost can't tell who is saying what, makes reading very difficult for this reader. And yes, you are right, for me, if I am confused, I wouldn't want to read any further. This is a shame though. The story looked very interesting from the summaries which I quite liked.