somesome wrote...
It's from Nasu's lolwriting about how in modern era heroic deeds are no longer considered spectacular thanks to technology, and if a gunslinger is considered famous it's not because of his own skill but rather the capabilities of his guns, thus the guns will be the ones that become Heroic Spirits, it was in the second Character Material iirc. It's nearly impossible for people who live in era of guns and science to believe in gods or heroes anymore, thus creating less legends and legendary figures.
Nearly impossible, but not impossible. :) Archer is an example. :P G. Washington, in fact, has more credibility because there are legends and myths surrounding his character and is also more well known.
somesome wrote...
Bro, you missed the reason why me and kaimax went so far explaining things to him. Anyone can be anything with Nasu's lolwriting but we were looking from currently existing sources here. If the words of Nasu is used as an excuse then I can just use some Japanese samurai character and claim he's a Saber/Rider/whatever because lol Nasu will provide a background story to make it reasonable later.
May be the case for you, but the main advocate, Kaimax, seems to be using Nasu's writing as source material so not sure why I'm not allowed to. :)
I just think you guys are putting way too much restriction on this. Sure it's ridiculous, but not all too far fetched. And because I love playing the devil's advocate.
Kaimax wrote...
You're missing my point. Gil was classed as archer due to his fighting style.
Alright, but:
Kaimax wrote...
What weapon did George use to unify the country?
Guns, rifles, cannons. If you can find a reliable source that they used swords more than guns and rifles, I'll accept it.
if you can't, the it shows that you just wanted him to be Saber because you like the Saber class.
I'll ask a similar question: If you can find a reliable source that Gilgamesh used Gate of Babylon to propel swords to kill his foes in any of his legends, then you win this argument.
Although I say this, to quell your bickering I'll do my best to explain why I support Soul's claim:
The emergence of muskets definitely made warfare mostly about guns but if anyone thinks the importance of swordsmanship was ever forgotten during the revolutionary era, then you're wrong. Read some documentations and there are mentions of great swordsmen. Not really sure what the point of dignifying a useless skill if it weren't important to the war. Bayonet charges were quite common in the war, and if you had a sword, you were using it. Although there aren't many historical documentation of the period, we know that G. Washington had training with swords.
Kaimax wrote...
Then what qualities from George do you think qualifies him to be placed in the Saber Class? His ceremonial dress swords?
No, cause generals switched to a different sword when in battle. Why? Common sense dictates they actually got used.
To cover more bases, I'll mention that having a "main" style doesn't necessarily mean you're summoned into that class. Example: Archer. I think he used his bow once? And used UBW a couple times to do a Gilgamesh, but more often fought with swords.
Do some research and you'll find it's not really too hard to swallow.
At one point, Medusa was given Pegasus as a gift from Poseidon.
What the hell?
Sweet baby Jesus I wrote more than I intended.