echoeagle3 wrote...
Just so you know, another english major, friend of mine is going to read it as well as Im trying to get one of the professor's to read it. Im DYING to know if they say anything about "You switch from past to present tense which creates inconsistencies". This story in particular is told in two tenses anyway because the story itself is past and the teller is telling it in the present. So I kind of think your complaint is BS.
also about the story seeming to be confusing, you haven't actually had much college level reading have you? ALL of it is confusing. This is for two reasons mainly, One is that it may have been written long ago before our current version of english and is therefor difficult to understand. And second and much more important is giving it the ability for analysis. If I write the sentence "The sky is blue." then that's it, thats all there is too it, im just stating a fact. However, if I write something like "The sky shimmered in a particular hue that was almost akin to azure" This could surely be taken to be saying the exact same thing but there is much more room for discussion. Mystery is what gives works of literature fuel for debate. If I was completely clear and terse about my story it would look like this.
Two young adults living in a magical world decided one boring day to summon a succubus. It was surely just going to be a fun time and nothing would go wrong. Only the creature that showed up was far beyond their expectations and soon the two were in grave danger. One of them manages to understand the danger and escapes leaving the other behind to his fate.
I want you to be completely honest, is that more enjoyable to read? Is cutting out all avenues of interpretation and mystery what you consider to be good writing? If so then I really don't think you are qualified to give advice in the superior tone that you seem accustomed to giving it in.
Also, what part "university literary journal" wasn't clear? I posted that at the start of all this.
You know, I always find it funny how condescending and defensive you can get, lol. Honestly, you just gotta relax, man. I was just sharing my opinion, so no need to be so uppity. You told me I could say what I wanted to say and I did. Was that really so bad that you had to retort the way you did?
Anyway, um... You misunderstood what I meant by confusing, lol. I got the story fine, as I said. It wasn't hard to grasp in any sense of the word. My confusion comes simply from my preference as I stated. I prefer stories that I
personally find more cohesive. It wasn't a stab at you or anything, just me stating my opinion. Also, it is a literary technique to not overemphasize. Describing something like the sky as blue is completely fine since it is common knowledge. Making it profound won't make a difference. Not everything needs to be written poetically. At the end of the day, I said it was good and that should be the first thing you should be proud of.
I've never once tried to speak about your work in a negative light, it's one of the things I learned in the writing forums and in college. You just keep taking it negatively when all it is is an opinion. My opinion. Something that you can disregard.
Finally, please don't insult my intelligence. It's not very nice, haha.