Tegumi wrote...
neko-chan wrote...
You don't have an argument.
You weren't paying attention, then.
I must of not of been, but right here is a chance to define what it is then... Wait, is this still about the coin thing?
Tegumi wrote...
neko-chan wrote...
Not according to Oscar Wilde. Sarcasm belittles both the person it is aimed at as well as the person using it.
Oscar Wilde, is, of course, a defining person by which we should live every drop of our lives by. Also, whether or not the sarcasm I use belittles myself is also entirely subjective.
There you go again with the sarcasm. Did you see that you disguise or at least deflect confrontation with it? You could of used the very technique I told you of:
Tegumi Rolls Eyes* Waves fingers in the air* : "Oscar Wilde, is,
of course, a defining person by which we should live every drop of our lives by"
You used sarcasm to argue about how sarcasm as the lowest form of humor is subjective [b] while - in the same post - talking about how you haven't used sarcasm as a point of argument:
Tegumi wrote...
neko-chan wrote...
It's even less appealing when you use it to argue a point.
I don't believe I've used sarcasm as a
point of argument at all here. Your assertion is moot.
See?
BTW your sig is totally awesome! I love kimi ni todoke! There is a second season is coming out soon!