Anesthetize wrote...
There was a good analogy i heard Michio Kaku once say that basically sums up my thoughts and many of the other scientists in the worlds thoughts about this topic.
We think we are so great that they will want to visit us, but maybe we are too primitive for them. After all, if we see an anthill, do we go down to the ants and say "I bring you beads. I bring you trinkets. Take me to your leader"? Some of us may even have the urge to step on them.
But the technological distance between an ant and us may be small compared to the technological chasm between us and a time-faring civilization. They may be thousands to millions of years ahead of us in technology, and hence have no interest in visiting us.
dragonsheart967 wrote...
Not only that, but from ancient civilizations that have been discovered, seemed to have some pretty advanced architecture then even we ourselves would be hard pressed to do so,and even some odd coincidential architecture designs from across the world.
Also lol tinfoil hat. If you knew anything about architectural history (im an arch student whom did arch history for a year), you would know that that statement is absolutely bullshit. It's a stupid way of thinking as well, you're basically saying i don't know how it's built but i do know how it's built. It's a contradiction you're saying how what is unknown can be explained. If this was the case then it wouldn't be unknown then.
When i say the whole architecture thing, I mean two main sorces. The Pyramids, for one, may seem unique, but if you look at it from the sky, and measure the base of them, then they match the measurements of another pyramid like structure(more like temple) in latin america or south america(forget which). Now, the general shape of these two ruins are not similar at all, it's a strange coincidence that they would have the
exact same base measurments.
The second would be Puma Punku. Those were buildings built with such presicion, we would need machinery to make them as precise. Hell, the actual stone that the civilization used was so incredibly dense, they would have needed their tools to be tiped with diamonds to really make a noticable mark at all. Now the blocks they carved worked as a form of puzzle piece, where there were just two basic shapes, and they fit into each other perfectly. Now these pieces could have gone where ever they wanted because they were so precise, they were pretty much exact replicas.
Now the really odd thing is that these are now ruins. Why it's odd is because those stones were several tons each, and obviouslym very large. Yet, they have been completely demolished by something that could shatter several tons of stone. Also, because of the weight of the stones, its a high mystery of how they were able to bring the stones over to where they placed them from where they made them.
Koyori wrote...
It's not unlogical to assume that there's aliens and that they might have been here. But... Humans can get good ideas without being told things by aliens so I don't really see why people even play the alien card. It doesn't seem much different from saying "How could someone just discover electricity? It must have been them aliens again!" from my point of view
Thats the thing though. It was said that the pyramids were built in 2 years(each). Now I myself may be in speculation as to when something sais anything was made within a certain timespan, but honestly, it would have taken a hell of a lot more time to build the pyramids. Hell, in order to bring the larger stones towards the top of the pyramid, they speculate that there should have been a ramp somewhere around 2 miles long, yet there is no evidence of that. Asuming that the given time is true, then each stone would have been made, cut, and placed every 8 seconds. I don't think they were working that fast.
But one of the odd things is, the corners of the pyramids act like a compass. They all point to north, east, ect. Now how did they know of anything like that?
Legendary_Dollci wrote...
Yeah I saw Ancient Aliens, and made me think ALOT about history.
However it is very hard to believe all that, here we are in the 21st century and we have no evidence regarding to alien encounters but in the past it is clearly written that they had MORE alien encounters with their highly advanced technology than in the past 1 or 2 hundred years.
Did they take all the "REAL" proof with them?
In the time of the Islamic founding, no history has ever been having so much "angel" encounters more than the Islam founding itself.
( There has been many stories regarding angels, and also regarding blue skinned colored creatures that are roaming around earth right now that are called (Djinn) )
I know aliens are referred to "beings outside our world", so I understand if they imply angels, demons, deities and such as aliens since they don't come from earth.
This topic will be fun.
That's the funny thing. Who's to say that those angels and demons and such weren't really aliens? That's another thing, is that it's perfectly possible that we saw them as gods. After all, in most religions, they write about a great being decending from the heavens. Some say that they came on a giant wheel of sorts, and these beings held power beyond they're comprehension. Remember, this is a time where writing is a new thing, where only the most important of events were going to be writen down, so they obviously wouldn't have any advanced vocabulary that we see as normal today.
There is an indian mytholigy where the gods flew on these flying machines(obviously not called that, but the actual name escapes me), and there were times where the machines would go to war with each other. Now the actual machines that they flew on may not have been very arodinamic as we see flying objects today, but they did have properties that looked to give them the abilities of flight, such as wings, rudders, and some sort of propulsion system.