are girls realy weak?
0
JokerFight wrote...
Koyori wrote...
JokerFight wrote...
Alina wrote...
JokerFight wrote...
Alina wrote...
Well, men can carry something twice their weight. I have to agree that women are weaker than men in physical strength though.
Men surpass women generally in strength.But it's not quite possible naturally men can
carry something twice their weight.Possibilities of succeeding that is by having intense strength training and endurance in a certain time.
Perhaps I was thinking of ants...
Ants...are much more remarkable than humans.They are the species of invertebrates that can lift something 50 times their own weight.I guess if ants have the same size with humans and also our intelligence,our proof of existence would be obliterated for eternity.
Yeah,due to their small size and the law of nature,they become strong.I respect ants.
Note:You have two accounts?
Nope I only have this one.
0
I always hear in my biology, genetics and evolutionary biology class that "Predisposition does not mean predetermination".
Theoretically, if I clone my self and make one male and female version, after the cloning, the male version will be stronger than the female counterpart. However, given a few time, depending on who exercises harder and eats a... I'll just say more proper diet, the female version can kick, beat and rape the ass out of the male version without any trouble whatsoever.
Theoretically, if I clone my self and make one male and female version, after the cloning, the male version will be stronger than the female counterpart. However, given a few time, depending on who exercises harder and eats a... I'll just say more proper diet, the female version can kick, beat and rape the ass out of the male version without any trouble whatsoever.
0
If we are to look at a controlled test, of a man and a woman does the exact same activities, the man would have more muscle growth and be some what stronger. But the woman would not be much weaker than the man.
0
Honestly, I have to say that physically men may have a slight advantage but most women mature at a faster rate than guys and therefore carry the advantage in intellectual strength.
0
Consider this:
Men are, by virtue of being chemically male and full of testosterone, are prone to more hard muscle tissue for large loads and heavy lifting.
On the flip side, estrogen, which is present in both men and women, but is predominantly a female hormone, is responsible for our skins sensitivity and flexibility.
This sensitivity and elasticity, combined with a proven doubled-or-higher pain tolerance than males, contributes to many agile and flexable female martial artists.
People don't stop to think about it this way, but female bone structures are built to carry child weight, and to fluctuate in weight and fat content thru out life, whereas men are ment to pretty much stay as they are after age 20, until they die. Females must be delicate in order to be able to do the things they do.
... That being said, I do believe that the initial poster of this post probably hasn't hit the age yet where he treats his siblings like people. Cheers to youth~.
Men are, by virtue of being chemically male and full of testosterone, are prone to more hard muscle tissue for large loads and heavy lifting.
On the flip side, estrogen, which is present in both men and women, but is predominantly a female hormone, is responsible for our skins sensitivity and flexibility.
This sensitivity and elasticity, combined with a proven doubled-or-higher pain tolerance than males, contributes to many agile and flexable female martial artists.
People don't stop to think about it this way, but female bone structures are built to carry child weight, and to fluctuate in weight and fat content thru out life, whereas men are ment to pretty much stay as they are after age 20, until they die. Females must be delicate in order to be able to do the things they do.
... That being said, I do believe that the initial poster of this post probably hasn't hit the age yet where he treats his siblings like people. Cheers to youth~.
0
All women should carry knives around.That ought to show men.
Girls are weaker,some are crazy strong though.The current record for a 600 pound benchpress goes to a Mongolian woman actually.
Girls are weaker,some are crazy strong though.The current record for a 600 pound benchpress goes to a Mongolian woman actually.
0
Vague way of putting 'are girls weak?'
From what you are viewing, it seems it is in the view of physical strength.
I believe girls can be strong, not a majority of course are strong in a physical strength sense. But yes, girls CAN be strong.
From what you are viewing, it seems it is in the view of physical strength.
I believe girls can be strong, not a majority of course are strong in a physical strength sense. But yes, girls CAN be strong.
0
It's to vague of a question honestly. Some women are stronger then some men, but yes, pit the worlds strongest man and the worlds strongest woman against each other and man ultimately wins. I myself am a woman, and stronger then quite a few of the men I know. But a lot of that has to do with sheer size. I'm a bit over 5'10" and about 220. Several of the guys I know are over a head shorter then I am. Makes sense, obviously, but I still hold my own against men around my size unless they make it a point to build lots of muscle.
0
If we look at the aspect of strength,generally men surpasses women.
But there's a lot of things women tend to surpass men like general intellects.
But there's a lot of things women tend to surpass men like general intellects.
0
kickiluxxx wrote...
I always hear in my biology, genetics and evolutionary biology class that "Predisposition does not mean predetermination."This should be the first things anyone is taught about genetics beyond the fact that DNA exists.
0
BAITMASTER wrote...
i was in my sisters room 2 days ago. we were just messing around makeing comments at each other. i made a joke which made my sister punch me in the shoulder.i start telling her "what was that did you just tap me or something?"she said she dident hit me hard cuase she was afraid of dislocateing my shoulder.so i dared her to punch me as hard as she could. so we got up off the bed and she starerd to punch me for a minute or so. we stoped cuase her hand started to hurt. after that ive been asking myself are women REALY that weak?if i wanted to kidnap or steal my sisters purse or something her weak ass attacks would never stop me.before that moment i thought women stood a good chance at defending themselfs. so heren lies the question are women realy weak or is it just my sister? or mabye its me? im 5 foot 10, 200 or so ibs i could propibly knock down a well sized man with a well placed punch to the chest.so girls you realy weak, or could you hold your own?
I don't think girls are weak. I faint watching the life channel when they show women delivering babies. If they can stand the flesh tearing and pain, well call me weak I sure damn well can't do that!
Physically perhaps since it's biochemistry of the gender but that doesn't mean they're incapable of surpassing that. i.e. Gina Carano (google her), she might not be your sister but I'm sure she can deliver a good hit or two.
To me girls aren't weak, it seems to be an option for them to either be or not to be. I prefer the latter.
0
ShinigamiAzrael wrote...
With girls, its kinda hard to say as each sex has a different build. 1. In muscle strength in general between a guy and girl with the same muscle mass:
guy wins due to body built to use higher % of that muscle
2. Pain tolerance: girls (but dependent on the nervous system at times)
3. Cold/Heat tolerance: girls
4. Other stuff: hard to say
Who Wins: It depends on what you're comparing
jw about the cold/heat thing is it a broad thing cause all girls i know are usually cold yet most my guy freind's find it normal so jw
0
I think usually guys are physically stronger than girls, but there are exceptions to the rule. I myself happen to be a very skinney man, so i am pretty sure most girls could kick my ass. Also, the mother of my niece can lift up my oldest brother, and 2 babies all at the same time. So there are exeptions to this
Also, both girls and guys are capable of working out/gaining muscle if they wish to do so. Your sister could work out and get stronger if she decided to put the effort in
Also, both girls and guys are capable of working out/gaining muscle if they wish to do so. Your sister could work out and get stronger if she decided to put the effort in
0
I notice a lot of people bring up the point about women giving birth adding to their overall pain tolerance and reverence.
Having more pain tolerance and having to deal with more pain throughout life aren't the same thing. Women aren't naturally pregnant, but can get pregnant and have a child if they choose to. There are drugs and other medicines to lessen the pain and keep the woman from dying. This would mean that a woman has the option of going through the pain (giving birth), or skipping most/all of it (C-section/infertility).
There are males that look at women giving birth like "Holy shit, nope.", but truth be told, if males absolutely had to do it, they would. Thus, giving birth gives no merit to women because they can just as easily not give birth, and men can't give birth at all.
I'm not saying that women do/don't have more pain tolerance than men, I'm just saying that the act of giving birth doesn't statistically prove anything, as it's not something both genders are capable of doing, but both genders are certainly capable of -not- doing it. Try a test with bullet wounds or something.
In the case of who is stronger, the obvious answer in terms of muscle mass is men. Women can get stronger and more athletic and beat up a skinny guy, yes, but if a man and a woman were to be trained exactly the same from birth, and then thrown into combat with one another, the male would be stronger simply because of his body structure. When thinking of this, take in consideration how high school fitness tests have different, and usually lower expectations in order to be fit for women as opposed to men.
On a side note, kicking or punching a male in the testicles makes you no stronger nor better than them, regardless of if you're a male or female. If anything, it shows that had they had the appropriate pelvic protection, you'd be absolutely out of options, thus making you tactless in general.
I find that a lot of males today seem almost superhuman in how quickly they can avoid or try to prevent testicle shots, probably due to growing up next to Little Suzie who's mother told her that whenever a boy bothers her to "hit him in the twigs and berries".
Having more pain tolerance and having to deal with more pain throughout life aren't the same thing. Women aren't naturally pregnant, but can get pregnant and have a child if they choose to. There are drugs and other medicines to lessen the pain and keep the woman from dying. This would mean that a woman has the option of going through the pain (giving birth), or skipping most/all of it (C-section/infertility).
There are males that look at women giving birth like "Holy shit, nope.", but truth be told, if males absolutely had to do it, they would. Thus, giving birth gives no merit to women because they can just as easily not give birth, and men can't give birth at all.
I'm not saying that women do/don't have more pain tolerance than men, I'm just saying that the act of giving birth doesn't statistically prove anything, as it's not something both genders are capable of doing, but both genders are certainly capable of -not- doing it. Try a test with bullet wounds or something.
In the case of who is stronger, the obvious answer in terms of muscle mass is men. Women can get stronger and more athletic and beat up a skinny guy, yes, but if a man and a woman were to be trained exactly the same from birth, and then thrown into combat with one another, the male would be stronger simply because of his body structure. When thinking of this, take in consideration how high school fitness tests have different, and usually lower expectations in order to be fit for women as opposed to men.
On a side note, kicking or punching a male in the testicles makes you no stronger nor better than them, regardless of if you're a male or female. If anything, it shows that had they had the appropriate pelvic protection, you'd be absolutely out of options, thus making you tactless in general.
I find that a lot of males today seem almost superhuman in how quickly they can avoid or try to prevent testicle shots, probably due to growing up next to Little Suzie who's mother told her that whenever a boy bothers her to "hit him in the twigs and berries".
0
Far from it... girls are not weak at all......
imagine all the physical tasks they do in life and think about the events that comes in their life when they become moms and grandmas....
I think women are very strong beings.
imagine all the physical tasks they do in life and think about the events that comes in their life when they become moms and grandmas....
I think women are very strong beings.
0
As the first comment said "90%+ of women are physically weaker then men", but I know a girl Michelle who can karate chop 3 planks of wood. I think she can dislocate my shoulder or has already because my right shoulder hurts more then my left, and cracks more.
0
I know i'm not weak. I can nock my 21year old bro out and he is in shape. My female friends can be pretty strong too. Of course, men are usually stronger, it's just nature, but it does not mean that we are weak as leafs.
Also, when you or a significant other are in danger, adrenaline is like magic so things might not go as you expected.
Also, when you or a significant other are in danger, adrenaline is like magic so things might not go as you expected.
0
I don't understand how this is a serious discussion it seems ignorant biased and sexist to me but if im wrong please correct me.
0
perithion wrote...
I don't understand how this is a serious discussion it seems ignorant biased and sexist to me but if im wrong please correct me.It's almost like you didn't read the opening post. He re-told the situation and asked a legitimate(to him) question, wanting an answer other than "LOL BOIYZ RUL3!". There are also multiple ways to respond to this reasonably, thus bringing in the "discussion" factor.
He wanted to know if all girls were as weak as his sister, who's punches have no power in them. That's not necessarily biased, as he doesn't directly say that all girls are in fact, weak. He also stated that there are situations where a girl could easily overpower a male with proper training, rather than sticking to the assumed notion that girls are weak.
Sexist? It depends on if you're a prude or not. To a prude, anything that has to do with anything regarding the opposite gender (usually female) is sexist.So this is sexist, if you deliberately think it to be. If you're someone who won't stick someone else with that title until they act completely chauvinistic, then no.
Ignorant? Of course. Though, how can we eliminate his ignorance if we simply leave him in the dark? The first step out of blissful ignorance usually requires a helping hand. Seeing as though he didn't post a deliberate troll post, then I feel we should at least give him a bit of our free time.
When angry, we often give other people hidden intentions simply to justify our annoyance.